Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

3:16 a.m. • 5-20-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 78° F
  • Tue: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 84° F
  • Wed: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 86° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2011-05-25 18:08:00
Updated: 2011-05-25 19:00:09

Legislation would keep teens from tanning beds


Tanning bed
Tanning bed
print friendly

A bill pending in the General Assembly would require anyone under 18 to get a physician's prescription to use a tanning booth.

State law now allows youths age 13 to 18 to go to a tanning parlor with parental permission, but Sen. Eric Mansfield, D-Cumberland, said the risk of contracting skin cancer from excessive exposure to the UV rays in tanning booths necessitates a medical referral.

"The outcome of this is a malignant disease that can be fatal, and that is much higher than the parental right,” said Mansfield, a Fayetteville physician.

He said he once had a teenage patient who developed melanoma, and he believes the disease was connected to her tanning bed use.

Under Senate Bill 471, physicians could approve teens going to tanning parlors to treat skin conditions like psoriasis and eczema. The prescription would specify the number of visits allowed and the length of each visit.

The Indoor Tanning Association estimated that 7 to 8 percent of business in North Carolina comes from people under 18, and tanning parlor owners said they doubt the bill would make any difference.

"(Teens) could bring anything into me. I'm not a pharmacist where I can judge if that prescription is actually valid," said Tricia Peterson, who owns the Carolina Sun salon in Hope Mills.

Peterson said a better solution would be to limit the number of times a teen can visit a tanning parlor.

She said the industry is already regulated, and teens can get just as much UV exposure outside from the sun.

"It's not like smoking or drinking where you can keep the product out of children's hands," she said. "It's a product that's available to them every day."


45 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 45 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
I think this proposed law is merely a silly compromise with tanning salon lobbyists. Afterall, wouldn't REAL prescriptions be written for licensed radiologists and not to corner tanning salons? But the main thing to consider here (all your politics aside) is that tanning is not being banned...simply do so the old fashioned way and go in the sun. Tanning BEDS should be banned...they're 15-times more potent than sun rays. Let your daughter smoke...no problem...but would you allow her to put a fish bowl over her head and pump in fifteen cigarettes of smoke at one time? Most likely not. THAT's the issue here...not banning tanning...but banning tanning beds which is nothing more than concentrated radiation. Just like smoking is not the only cause of lung cancer...just the main cause....tanning beds is similarly proven to be a significant cause of skin cancer.

"What's wrong with parents ruling what their kids do?"

Exactly! We're telling them what then can smoke (pot), when they can drink, what they can do with their own bodies (sex/abortions)...IT'S SOCIALISM RUN AMOK I TELL YOU!

Looks like our state law makers are trying to act like the Fed Govt and control everything...Tanning beds...what a crock. There are so many other things their attention should have been on, i.e., Elaine F. Marshall, SOS, and the way she's destroying state records, and costing us millions of dollars each year in her malfeasance of duty & incompetence. We're going broke and they're worrying about tanning booths for teenagers??? What's wrong with parents ruling what their kids do?...no let's put the responsibility on State Lawmakers. This is taking it too far.

"Its unsafe no matter what an parent says and since obviously we can't rely on parents doing the smart thing then I see no reason for letting tanning salons kill kids for profit just because their parents are fools."

Oh, I know haggis. Not sure I agree with making a new law about it, but....*shrugs* I'm just amused at the people who are ususally so anti "Nanny State" proclaiming the virtues of this legislation.

"isn't that the job of the parent though? Deciding what is, and isn't, safe for their kids?"

Its unsafe no matter what an parent says and since obviously we can't rely on parents doing the smart thing then I see no reason for letting tanning salons kill kids for profit just because their parents are fools.

View Comments VIEW ALL 45 COMMENTS

Political Video Picks

 
  • WRAL News anchor David Crabtree goes 'On the Record' about the Opportunity Scholarships Act and recaps crossover week at the state…

  • Dozens of proposals failed to clear the House or Senate before the General Assembly's self-imposed "crossover" deadline this week for…

  • The scandal within the Internal Revenue Service was front and center Friday on Capitol Hill, as a committee heard testimony from…

  • The House and Ways Committee holds a hearing on the Internal Revenue Service's practice of targeting conservative political groups.…

  • The state House has released its own version of a tax reform bill that lower income and sales tax rates, but makes fewer sweeping…

  • The House approved several bills before the "crossover" deadline, including measures on abortion and social media privacy.