@NCCapitol

DOT: Legislative action jeopardizes Wake highway project

Posted March 9, 2011

— Bills designed to prevent the state Department of Transportation from building an extension of the Triangle Expressway through Garner could kill the entire project, DOT officials said Wednesday.

The North Carolina Turnpike Authority is selecting a path to complete N.C. Highway 540 in southeastern Wake County. A final decision isn't expected until late 2013.

The authority in November recommended that the so-called "red route" not be used because of the adverse affect it would have on 13 neighborhoods, a church and the town’s primary industrial recruitment area.

Federal transportation officials said, however, that the route must remain under consideration because an endangered species of mussels had been discovered in a creek along the original planned expansion area, known as the "orange route."

DOT officials say the two routes are the only feasible corridors at this point for the N.C. 540 extension. In order to get an environmental permit and begin construction, the Army Corps of Engineers requires that both routes be studied.

"We've got to go through these studies, and we don't have an option if the option is to move forward," said Steve DeWitt, chief engineer for the Turnpike Authority.

DOT officials have pledged to Garner officials that, if federal highway officials select the red route for the highway, the state won't build it.

"It would be an awful route to ever build, and we don't intend to do that," DeWitt said.

Roland Beauchaine, whose house would be split in two by the red route, said he doesn't trust the DOT to stick to that pledge.

"It's not legally binding. They can change their minds," Beauchaine said.

Sens. Richard Stevens and Dan Blue and Reps. Rosa Gill, Darren Jackson and Deborah Ross, whose districts include Garner, introduced legislation last week that would prohibit the red route from being used.

Map of N.C. 540 extension, red route DOT: Legislative action jeopardizes Wake highway project

The Senate is expected to consider Senate Bill 165 on Thursday.

That measure and House Bill 225 both stipulate that the Triangle Expressway’s southeast extension “shall not be located north of an existing protected corridor established by the Department of Transportation circa 1995, except in the area of Interstate 40 East.”

The southeast extension of N.C. 540 will extend the Triangle Expressway – currently under construction in southwest Wake County – and complete the loop highway around Raleigh. Construction could begin as early as 2018.

Garner Mayor Ronnie Williams called the red route "a bombshell," saying economic development in the town could stall because businesses fear being wiped out by future highway construction.

"It's almost like a tsunami is going to hit Garner," Williams said.

Eliminating the route from any study or future consideration remains the mayor's top priority, even if it means Garner would never have access to N.C. 540.

"If it gets rid of the project totally, we'll just have to deal with it," he said.

Beauchaine said he would rather have no highway loop as well, but he remains optimistic.

"I do believe that, when the pressure comes and gets applied, they will find a solution," he said.

13 Comments

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Oldest First
View all
  • GoHeelsGo Mar 17, 7:22 p.m.

    "It's almost like a tsunami is going to hit Garner," Williams said.
    Ouch!

  • rroadrunner99 Mar 10, 1:22 p.m.

    The Fed's are here. Ever heard that saying"Federal Law top's State law"? So make all the state law's you want, the Fed's will build what they want to, where they want to, when they want to. For North Carolina all the Federal highway money will be hanging in the balance. Then they will make it a toll road and tax us to death for it. And to get the land... ever heard of "Eminent Domain" law's?

  • seaobin Mar 10, 11:20 a.m.

    If they do not at least connect the outer loop to 40 south of Garner, they have removed a good portion of the loops usefulness (diverting I-40 traffic out of the Raleigh Metro area) They need to get this finished, it has been going on fro over 20 yrs already

  • m0nky Mar 10, 10:42 a.m.

    so they say they don't want to build the red route but must have it as a consideration to even have the chance of building the orange route.

    so what is the problem here people? they want to build the orange route. but in order to do so they need a permit. in order to get the permit they need at least one other route considered. if the red route is picked by the army corps, they won't build it.

    this isn't hard logic to follow.

  • superman Mar 10, 10:18 a.m.

    So as not to bother anyone or relocating anyone-- dont build anymore new roads. Our subdivision road has big potholes as well as places where the asphalt has upheaved. I hope the DOT will use some of their unused funds to resurface our road. Our road is about 25 years old and the road has never been resurfaced. Please-- no more new roads just repair ours.

  • ObamaMustGo aka NCcarguy Mar 10, 10:17 a.m.

    I say keep going with the bills then. If all we're losing there is a toll road, then good.

  • GarnerDoug Mar 10, 9:21 a.m.

    "Garner complains and whines as much as Cary does now, only difference is the income level."

    Wow "RNRCP", I'd like to thank you for all of Garner for your elimination of our clean, quiet, and well-managed little town from YOUR highway. Maybe you'd whine too if your town or house were buzzsawed down the middle.

  • HeadPro Mar 10, 8:06 a.m.

    Muscles huh??? I wonder if these are the same muscles that have stopped hundreds of projects across the east. Hmmmmm... they don't sound to endangered to me. Perhaps a convenient excuse?

  • soyousay Mar 9, 7:57 p.m.

    so there will be no toll road...sure

  • rnrcp Mar 9, 7:41 p.m.

    Just cut Garner out of the picture and stop worrying about it. Garner complains and whines as much as Cary does now, only difference is the income level.

More...