Raleigh, N.C. — Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's comments at a fundraiser earlier this year have sparked a national debate about who pays and who doesn't pay income taxes.
Romney was secretly videotaped telling supporters that "[M]y job is is not to worry about" 47% of the nation's population because they don't pay taxes and believe they are victims and entitled to a range of government support. He said he would not try to win their votes because "I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."
Most experts agree about 47 percent of Americans don't owe federal income taxes. The nonpartisan Center for Budget and Policy Priorities says about 61 percent of those people work and do pay federal payroll taxes, which fund Social Security and Medicare.
Another 22 percent of people who don't pay income tax are senior citizens, who benefit from higher deductions and Social Security benefits that usually aren't taxed. The remaining 17 percent include students, people with disabilities, the long-term unemployed and wealthier people whose deductions outweigh their tax debts.
About four out of five filers who don't owe federal income tax make less than $30,000 a year.
According to the nonpartisan Tax Foundation, the states with the highest percentage of people who don't owe federal income tax are mostly in the South. Mississippi ranks first, followed by Georgia, Alabama, Florida and Arkansas.
North Carolina ranks 12th on the list, with 37.9 percent of the people who filed federal tax returns in 2010 not owing any federal income tax.
The state ranks high because it has one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation. Also, its poverty rate is higher than the national average and median household income lower than average. That means more households either don't make enough to owe taxes or they're eligible for tax credits and deductions that offset them.
North Carolina's population of seniors also is growing, and the state has a large number of active-duty military members who don't pay federal income tax on their combat pay or living allowances.
Even those who don't pay federal income tax pay taxes in some form, such as sales tax, excise tax on cars and gasoline and property tax.




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2010/08/30/8212390/8362364-1286459151-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/weather/2007/07/30/1649447/1649447-1209833775-100x75.jpg)








WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
You are talking about a tax on value, not a tax on earnings. That is radically different than the feds treat any other investment. Local governments have all sorts of those type of taxes, but the feds don't. It is really an anti-growth strategy if there every was one. You don't just tax growth once, you tax it year, after year, after year. eg your home increasing in value, so the county sends you a bigger tax bill forever. Taxes on value instead of transactions are much more market distorting because true costs are not visible at the time of the transaction.
September 21, 2012 9:09 a.m.
So what you're telling is that I shouldn't attempt to save for my own retirement? Do you really understand the consequences of such an activity? That's not going to hit "fat cats" in any meaningful way, but it sure will screw responsible middle class workers and kill the 401K outright.
September 21, 2012 8:55 a.m.
You better work it lady! lol, tell me your secrets. I'm tired of paying so bumpkins can sit around with attitude.
September 21, 2012 8:41 a.m.
September 21, 2012 8:13 a.m.
Yup... I understand... my point was... if we are to tax all income equally... then it should include 401K's, not just when they are drawn upon, but each year. And yup... I understand why it is in our best interest and the govt's interest we save... cause Social Security may not be that secure.
But I do appreciate BillO's position.
September 20, 2012 7:10 p.m.