NC Chamber wants to cut state unemployment benefits

Posted May 28, 2012


— The state's largest business lobby and advocates for workers are squaring off over how to fix North Carolina's bankrupt unemployment system.

North Carolina owes the federal government a staggering $2.8 billion for borrowing to cover unemployment checks to workers statewide during the recession, and the debt continues to grow.

Lawmakers are looking for solutions to the problem, and a new report commissioned by the North Carolina Chamber recommends cutting the size and length of weekly benefits.

The state pays a higher percentage of former salary than the national average, and its maximum weekly benefit is much higher than other Southeastern states. North Carolina pays up to $506 a week, while Virginia, which is second in the region, pays no more than $378 a week.

The N.C. Chamber report calls for capping the weekly check at $350 and cutting the number of weeks of benefits from 26 to 20.

"We're just trying to bring them in line with the Southeast and be competitive there," said Gary Salomido, vice president of government affairs for the state chamber.

Salomido said the problem with the state's unemployment insurance trust fund dates to the 1990s, when lawmakers lowered state unemployment taxes and expanded benefits.

"Things were really good. No one thought this bad day would ever come," he said. "For a long time, all of us just didn't pay as close attention as we should have to making sure that, when things really get bad, the trust fund is there for them."

Latest jobless rate misleading Labor advocates criticize idea of cutting jobless benefits

North Carolina's business community needs a solution soon, he said, because federal taxes on employers automatically increase every year until the state pays off its debt.

Legislative leaders say they're planning to take up a massive unemployment overhaul early next year.

Advocates for workers said employers are now simply trying to get out of paying their fair share for laid-off workers.

"When the economy was flush and unemployment was low, businesses got a tax break," said Mary McMillan, state director for the AFL-CIO. "Now, they want to rebuild the trust fund on the backs of the unemployed, which we think is unjust and shouldn't happen."

McMillan said a recession is no time to cut unemployment benefits.

"There's one job for every three job seekers," she said. "We feel like, in this tough labor market, we still need to provide support to these families who are struggling to pay bills and put food on the table."

Salomido said the proposed changes wouldn't take effect right away, so the jobless wouldn't be affected immediately. Also, he said, employers would pay more under the N.C. Chamber's plan, and the group is calling on the state to issue bonds to pay off what's owed to the federal government more quickly.

"It's a comprehensive solution," he said. "Not one piece can be done in isolation, and it's for future benefits. It's not for anybody that's affected right now."


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • storchheim May 29, 2012

    "Employers should not be paying for the ESC error, especially when no heads rolled on that issue." Ladyblue

    It's not too late to prosecute the ESC. But, due to the jobs-for-incompetents nature of the division, they'll get away with it.

    Though I can't help but note that employers laid lots of people off and then made the remaining emps do the work of 3. Sure, some HAD to in order to survive, but how many saw a chance and jumped on the bandwagon like an EMS on their way home, turning on the siren when they want to make a left turn unobstructed?

    And I'm not for a moment saying that none of the recips are taking advantage either, it's just that UE pays a lot less than regular work, so who wouldn't work if they could?

  • Jim Britt May 29, 2012

    The best way to cut unemployment benefits is to cut unemployment. Start hiring people business community.

  • ladyblue May 29, 2012

    This is pitiful. I can remember when NC was bragging how big it's surplus was....How much of that money owed back (and being absorbed by employers with increases each year) is due to the error the ESC made by paying people out of NC instead of federal monies in the last year? Employers should not be paying for the ESC error, especially when no heads rolled on that issue.

  • Squirreling Dervish May 29, 2012

    His name is Gary SALAMIDO, not Salomido


  • cgpvnp May 29, 2012

    How can they even think about cutting unemployment benefits? Are they really so dense as to not realize the havoc that would bring?

    The federal gov't just cut benefits by 20 weeks-where is the outcry about that? And NC weekly max is $522, not $506. It has been that amount since August 2011- a little behind on the figures in the story--by nine months.

  • piene2 May 29, 2012

    How can they even think about cutting unemployment benefits? Are they really so dense as to not realize the havoc that would bring?