banner
@NCCapitol

No consensus on effects of NC marriage amendment

Posted May 3, 2012
Updated May 4, 2012

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— After months of rallies, marches and heated debate, North Carolina's proposed marriage amendment is less than a week away from the ballot box.

The amendment on the ballot reads, "Marriage between one man and one woman is the only domestic legal union that shall be valid or recognized in this state."

But there's a second sentence to it that is not on the ballot that would also be added to the constitution if the amendment passes: "This section does not prohibit a private party from entering into contracts with another private party; nor does this section prohibit courts from adjudicating the rights of private parties pursuant to such contracts."

The amendment would ban same-sex marriages, civil unions and domestic partnerships for unmarried couples, straight or gay. It could only be changed by another constitutional amendment.

Twenty-eight other states have approved constitutional bans on same-sex marriage, but the bans are not all the same. Some only address marriage, while others go further. No other state has enacted the exact language of North Carolina's amendment.

"This is the most ambiguous of any in the country. If the supporters really wanted to just prohibit same-sex marriage, that's the amendment they should have written. They reached too far," said Suzanne Reynolds, associate dean at the Wake Forest University School of Law.

Reynolds said the phrase "domestic legal union" is not defined in state law. She says a judge could decide it means domestic violence laws don't apply to unmarried couples. That has already happened in Ohio, where court cases were tied up for three years.

Rockingham County District Attorney Phil Berger Jr., the son of Republican Senate Leader Phil Berger, said North Carolina laws are different.

NC Marriage Amendment NC Marriage amendment: what it does

"This amendment will have no impact on domestic violence prosecutions, and the citizens of this state should not be deceived into thinking otherwise," the district attorney said.

Amendment opponents also say it could cut off health insurance benefits for unmarried partners and their children, especially those who are civil employees.

Tami Fitzgerald, chairwoman for Vote FOR Marriage NC, which supports the amendment, said that's not true.

"I think it's speculation on their part. There are no children who will lose their health care," Fitzgerald said.

The second part of the amendment protects private employers' benefits, but not public ones.

"In every state with an amendment as broad as ours, that has been the conclusion – that public employers may not offer benefits to the domestic partners and children of their employees," Reynolds said.

Nine local governments in the state offer domestic partner benefits – Orange, Mecklenburg and Durham counties, and the cities of Durham, Hillsborough, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Asheville and Greensboro. If the amendment passes, they will have to stop providing those benefits when it takes effect later this month.

Even among legal experts, there's no consensus about the amendment.

The official explanation approved by the state's Constitutional Amendments Publication Commission says the amendment could affect employment-related benefits for domestic partners, domestic violence laws, child custody and visitation rights, and end-of-life arrangements.

"The courts will ultimately make those decisions," the commission said.

Whether or not the amendment passes, same-sex marriage will still be illegal. It has been against the law since 1996, and it has not yet faced a serious challenge.

In the meantime, the tide elsewhere seems to be moving in the other direction. In the past year, lawmakers in New York, Maryland and Washington have passed laws permitting same-sex marriage.

Both sides in North Carolina's fight have accused the other of being funded by out-of-state interests, but each side has raised about 70% of its money from in-state donors.

93 Comments

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Oldest First
View all
  • timtooltime777 May 4, 7:18 p.m.

    It is all about money ! Period

  • Scubagirl May 4, 6:56 p.m.

    And the fact that this is happening in 2012 and not 1950 is even more mind boggling.

  • SARCASTICLES May 4, 6:30 p.m.

    The GOP will be stunned when they realize that their plan to put this on the ballot in order to draw "Freedom Lovin'", "Less Government" far right evangelical "Christians" to the polls has BACKFIRED. It kinda makes you wonder whether it ever occurred to them that the sane majority, regular folks who wear sneakers or the occasional python boot, will come out in DROVES to stop this desperate attempt by the fascists to force THEIR minority opinion on the rest of us. Good luck in 2072, GOP.....mean it. ;)

  • determined2win May 4, 6:13 p.m.

    What amazes me is that many people believe in a separation of church & state, unless they need the state to step in and decide on an issue - like marriage - that most feel is a religious institution... can't have it both ways, folks.

  • SARCASTICLES May 4, 6:05 p.m.

    So........what does Mitt Romney think about the marriage amendment in NC? He SURE is QUIET about the whole issue. Don't be bashful, Mitt....the far right evangelicals ain't listenin'.....so tell us what YOU think. (heh heh heh) ;)

  • nralgreen May 4, 5:58 p.m.

    Independent_thinker, I think Libertarians are voting against this amendment.

  • carolinapatriot May 4, 5:41 p.m.

    Technically, colonzalla, they fought to keep the federal government out of their business, and let the states decide for themselves what they want to do. Which is exactly what this case is. However, if you want to argue that it is inconsistent with smaller government at all levels, you are correct.

  • independent_thinker May 4, 5:26 p.m.

    I've yet to hear a cogent public policy reason to vote yes. All of the pro amendment arguments are religious.

    When will true conservatives and libertarians stand up and vote down this big government attempt to control personal choices and increase the power of the nanny state?

  • WooHoo2You May 4, 4:58 p.m.

    if Obamacare is not repealed, current laws to require businesses to offer insurance will be lifted- sillywabbitthepatriot

    Businesses are *not required* to offer health insurance.

  • colonlanzolla May 4, 4:34 p.m.

    WHAT AMAZES ME WAS THAT THE SOUTH FOUGHT A WAR TO KEEP GOVERNMENT OUT OF THEIR BUSINESS, BUT KNOW ARE TRYING TO DO EXACTLY THAT TO THEIR OWN PEOPLE. HOW IS YOUR LIFE AND MARRIAGE AFFECTED BY WHOM OTHERS LOVE? SPEND LESS TIME THINKING ABOUT WHO SLEEPS WITH WHOM AND WHAT THEY DO IN BED, AND WORRY AND NURTURE YOUR RELATIONSHIPS INSTEAD!

More...