Raleigh, N.C. — Two political-action committees affiliated with an anti-abortion group have filed a federal lawsuit to challenge North Carolina's law allowing public funding of judicial campaigns.
North Carolina Right to Life PAC and North Carolina Right to Life Committee Fund for Independent Political Expenditures want the law declared unconstitutional, claiming that it violates their free speech rights.
Under the Voter-Owned Elections Act, judicial candidates who apply for public financing cannot obtain large contributions from individuals or special-interest groups. Whenever donations to a candidate who chooses to seek private contributions top a specified threshold, the state releases matching funds to the candidate's opponents who have signed up for public financing.
"This matching funds scheme imposes a substantial burden on the speech of privately financed candidates and independent expenditure groups while releasing all publicly financed candidates from their agreed-to expenditure limits," the two groups said in their suit.
The groups tried to overturn the law five years ago, but both federal district and appellate courts ruled against them. They said they are making a second run at the law after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a similar matching-fund law in Arizona.
Since their initial suit, the groups said, they haven't provided financial support for any state Supreme Court candidate "for fear that the $240,100 trigger for matching funds for candidates ... would be pulled and cause funding to go to a candidate they did not support."
Their reluctance to contribute to the campaigns of candidates they support is evidence that their free speech rights are being "chilled" by the state law, they argue, asking that the law be overturned in time for the 2012 election.




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/business/2013/05/06/12417151/2457a21a00d94324b6fc448c8ec173d0-Photo-1-100x70.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Yup
September 14, 2011 3:58 p.m.
I'd be for that, but the problem is, politicians would have to vote for this to be put into place, and they are already bought.
September 14, 2011 2:26 p.m.
That assures that whoever raises the most money wins, and effectively puts candidates at the mercy of the guys writing the checks. It's a backdoor way of legalizing bribery.
September 14, 2011 1:26 p.m.
You qualify for the funding by submitting a petition with Y% of registered voters as of the last election. The state will provide petition forms, pens and clipboards. The parties may, if they choose, provide places and times when people can come sign petitions, but are not allowed to provide anything more than a speaking podium with microphone, tables, chairs and water.
My husband and I have thought about this a LOT. We think the biggest hurdle (aside from the entrenched interests) is selecting who qualifies for funding, then tracking it. I'd prefer the gov't provides most of the 'financing' as materials / media time, rather than $$, to reduce fraud.
September 14, 2011 1:19 p.m.
Money IS the root of all evil.
September 14, 2011 12:31 p.m.