Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

3:15 a.m. • 5-18-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 82° F
  • Sun: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 78° F
  • Mon: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 80° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image
@NCCapitol
print friendly

Lewis: New voter ID bill unlikely

Published: 2012-06-25 17:30:01
Updated: 2012-06-25 17:30:01

Lawmakers start their last week of work for the legislative session tonight. As legislators look to wrap up unfinished business, a key House leader says its unlikely that a new voter ID bill will be forthcoming this year.

"It's gone," said Rep. David Lewis, R-Harnett, who chairs the committee which oversees election laws and would have been the point person to shepherd a new voter ID bill through the House.

Under current law, most voters do not have to show ID when they come to the polls. Under a version of voter ID bill that Gov. Bev Perdue, a Democrat, vetoed last year, most voter would have to provide photo identification before casting a ballot. 

Proponents of the measure say voter ID would help make sure people don't vote in the name of others or cast ballots when they're not qualified to do so. Opponents say there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud and ID laws would disproportionately keep poor, elderly and college-age voters from casting ballots.

The House has thus far been unable to override Perdue's veto. House Speaker Thom Tillis has said he was very eager to find a compromise this year, mentioning his hopes in multiple interviews. A compromise bill would have allowed voters to show documents other than a photo ID, such as utility bills, when voting. 

But it now appears that hope of compromise is mostly gone thanks to the calendar. Any change to statewide voting law would have to be pre-cleared by the U.S. Justice Department or the courts. The DOJ could take up to 120 days before taking action, which at this point would run right into early voting for the fall general election. 

"Honestly, we've been advised the chances of it being pre-cleared prior to early voting are slim, making it not worth pursuing," Lewis said. Other lawmakers and legislative staff confirm this assessment. 

In addition to the pre-clearance calendar, the legislative session calendar is also working against Republicans. Any controversial bill -- which a new voter ID measure would be -- would eat of lots of legislative time already allocated to wrapping up other business. 

While they are giving up on a compromise measure, House Republicans could still attempt to override Perdue's veto on the original voter ID bill this week. However, assuming no Democrats have flipped on the issue, all the House minority has to do is ensure their members show up for one more week of floor sessions to stave off a vote. 

 

Read More Posts from this Blog

2 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.


page 1
sort order: oldest first | newest first

"So does this mean that there IS voter frraud, it's just not "wide spread?" That's sure what it looks like."

So if it's estimated that there are only a handful of fraud cases that voter ID might help prevent, but it's also estimated that far, far more people who are legitimately registered would be prevented from voting, then you err on the side of tolerating a handful of suspected fraud that is unlikely to swing an election, rather than imposing a restrictive ID requirement that is much more likely to swing the election. But of course that's what the republicans are hoping for. It's disgraceful.

Opponents say there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud

So does this mean that there IS voter frraud, it's just not "wide spread?" That's sure what it looks like.

page 1
sort order: oldest first | newest first

Political Video Picks

 
  • Dozens of proposals failed to clear the House or Senate before the General Assembly's self-imposed "crossover" deadline this week for…

  • The scandal within the Internal Revenue Service was front and center Friday on Capitol Hill, as a committee heard testimony from…

  • The House and Ways Committee holds a hearing on the Internal Revenue Service's practice of targeting conservative political groups.…

  • The state House has released its own version of a tax reform bill that lower income and sales tax rates, but makes fewer sweeping…

  • The House approved several bills before the "crossover" deadline, including measures on abortion and social media privacy.

  • President Obama says he'll hold a Rose Garden news conference Thursday to answer questions about the scandal enveloping the Internal…