Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

4:11 p.m. • 5-21-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Wed: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 84° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 80° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 76° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image
@NCCapitol
print friendly

Dems file bills to fight alleged GOP 'War on Women'

Published: 2012-06-05 19:44:00
Updated: 2012-06-06 10:27:09

Accusing their Republican counterparts of waging a "War on Women" in North Carolina, House and Senate Democrats announced today they've filed bills to repeal measures restricting abortion and cutting off funding for Planned Parenthood. 

Last year's GOP-penned budget banned the state from directing any state or federal pass-through funds to Planned Parenthood. Public funding already cannot be used to provide abortion services. The budget provision also banned public funding for non-abortion-related services, from testing and counseling for sexually transmitted diseases to breast and cervical cancer screenings for low-income women.

That provision has been stayed by the courts.

This year's budget would take the additional step of banning county health departments from contracting with Planned Parenthood to provide any services.  

"Planned Parenthood saves lives," said Rep. Alma Adams, D-Guilford, noting that it's the only healthcare available to many low-income women and men. She said most county health departments are not equipped to offer those primary services.  "Republicans claim they're for keeping government out of people's lives. Why doesn't that apply when it comes to women's lives?" asked Adams.

Democrats said they're also filing bills to repeal the "Women's Right to Know" act, a law that requires doctors to read a state-mandated script to women seeking abortions, explaining (among other things) that the father could be required to provide financial help and that government assistance may be available to her. 

The woman must also obtain an ultrasound no less than 4 hours before the abortion. The doctor or tech must describe the images to her and offer her the opportunity to hear the fetal heartbeat. If she refuses, she must sign a waiver saying so.

There are no exceptions for rape, incest, or terminal pregnancies. 

"Can you think of anything more offensive than for the government to say to a victim of rape and incest - we're gonna make you the victim?" said Sen. Doug Berger, D-Franklin.  

State courts have already put parts of that law on hold after finding that a legal challenge on First Amendment grounds had a good chance of succeeding. 

Republican supporters of the measure said it was intended to protect women from being pressured into abortions they don't want.  

Other Democrats cited cuts to programs that help women, from child-care subsidies and domestic violence prevention to education and mental health. 

"It is really a crime for the legislature to say to [women], 'We'll make decisions for you...we'll make decisions for your doctor,'" said Senator Gladys Robinson, D-Guilford. 

Two of the five women currently serving in the Senate are Republicans. They've refrained from the debate on either of the bills.

"[Senate Republicans] don't allow their women to say anything," Robinson said.  

One of those two GOP women senators, Sen. Kathy Harrington, R-Gaston, said she hoped Robinson was joking.

"If not, her assertion is not only patently false, but insulting," Harrington said in an emailed statement. "As a freshman Republican senator, I was honored to be named as Chairman of Transportation Appropriations and Vice Chairman of the Transportation and Finance committees."

"My colleagues treat me with the utmost respect, and I know my opinions are valued," Harrington added. "Divisive comments like these are unproductive and uncalled for.”

 

Read More Posts from this Blog

2 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

This blog post is closed for comments.


page 1
sort order: oldest first | newest first

I find it ironic that they would call it a "War on Women" when I'm sure the REPS love their mothers, wives and daughters as much as the next person. Sometimes this grandstanding goes beyond the edge.

Here is the War and its battle on the ladies "The budget provision also banned public funding for non-abortion-related services, from testing and counseling for sexually transmitted diseases to breast and cervical cancer screenings for low-income women. In other state they are marginalizing Planned PArenthoods efforts by making strange building codes, or allowing the communications of threats under the guise of Freedom of Speech. WHAT YEAR IS IT PEOPLE?????? Donna Reed doesn't live here, or June Cleever. This is the erosion of civil rights for those least able to defend themselves. Thnak god money is speech so the richies aren't so emcumberred

page 1
sort order: oldest first | newest first

Political Video Picks

 
  • Capitol Bureau Chief Laura Leslie and investigative reporter Mark Binker break down the North Carolina Senate's budget proposal.

  • The Senate budget subcommittee on health and human services gives a presentation on May 20, 2013.

  • North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper and a number of local law enforcement officials from across the state on Monday criticized…

  • Some teachers say the proposed Senate budget, which includes no pay raise for teachers and other changes to education funding, is…

  • Lawmakers called it a step toward a more expansive biometric system that would use identifiers such as fingerprints to keep track of…

  • Attorney General Roy Cooper and other law enforcement officials speak out against the Senate's budget proposal to move the SBI under…