Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

12:50 p.m. • 5-21-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 82° F
  • Wed: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 84° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 80° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image
@NCCapitol
print friendly

Money and the "Marriage Amendment"

Published: 2012-04-24 20:21:00
Updated: 2012-04-24 21:11:20

Supporters of NC's proposed constitutional ban on same-sex unions got an email appeal today from the National Organization for Marriage's Brian Brown. 

"My friend, for the first time, I'm truly concerned that we could lose this battle," Brown says in his message. "Tami Fitzgerald, head of Vote for Marriage NC, tells me that they have had to cut their advertising budget by two-thirds simply because they don't have the money."

Warnings of potential defeat are hardly an unusual tactic in political fundraising. But in this case, the numbers (so far) suggest Brown may have a point.

Opponents of the so-called "Marriage Amendment" unveiled two anti-amendment TV spots Monday. They say their ad buy is around $500,000 statewide.  You can see the spots here and here. 

Supporters of the amendment announced today their ad is on the air, too, but Vote4Marriage spokeswoman Rachel Lee declined to provide details about the size or location of the media buy. You can see that spot here.

Outspent?  

In today's email to supporters, posted on NOM's blog, Brown blamed "Hollywood liberals" for financing an ad buy he says will outnumber the pro-Amendment spots "3 to 1." 

Organization# of Network Ads in Charlotte and RaleighGross Cost
Protect All NC Families615$462,390
Vote for Marriage312

$216,915

 

Data compiled by WRAL's Mark Binker shows that ratio is overstated. But at this point, with election day just two weeks away, amendment opponents are clearly outspending supporters.

The opponents: $462.4K

  • The Charlotte and Triangle network TV media buy by amendment opponents Coalition to Protect NC Families is $462,390 as of April 24th. That total spending bought 615 spots, about 60 % of them in Charlotte.
  • The same group spent another $91,000 on cable spots so far on 9 networks in Charlotte, Greensboro, and the Triangle.

The supporters: $216.9K

  • Vote4MarriageNC, the main group backing the amendment, bought network TV time in Charlotte and Triangle worth $216,915 as of April 24th. That money bought 312 network TV spots, 65 percent of those in Charlotte. 
  • Vote4Marriage also spent $56,500 on cable buys on 13 networks in Charlotte, Greensboro, the Triangle, and Wilmington. 

We're still working on getting info from Greensboro/Triad area stations. Still, the trend from the state's two larges media markets shows opponents outspending amendment backers roughly 2-to-1 on television.

Note: Thanks to Stuart Watson of WCNC in Charlotte, who is working with us to gather television station public file information.

Read More Posts from this Blog

5 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

This blog post is closed for comments.


page 1
sort order: oldest first | newest first

They have Newt Gingrich working on behalf of the NOM group and what better example of the sanctity of marriage than a thrice married serial adulterer?

I'm not personally for gay marriage, but I also don't believe the state has any right to tell anyone who they can marry in order to be treated fairly. What happened to separation of church and state? Sounds like to me the state is trying to weasel out of any additional tax breaks, or benefits that would be given out if same sex marriage was approved.

Vote FOR the marriage amendment! The amendment will not keep people from being treated fairly- or in any way they are treated now.

money should have no influence on this one--it is a simple matter of morals and morality--and no amount of money, spinning, twisting or turning will change that.

The same Christian conservatives who Tea-partied themselves into smaller government, government getting out of our lives, etc... now demand that government get involved in what is clearly not a government role, nor fight. What next, a 'moral statute' against unwed mothers? Single mothers/fathers? Jail time for giving birth out of wedlock?

They can call it whatever they wish, but ultimately it is about their innate fear of what does not equal their definition of family. Call it morals or morality if it makes you feel better, but it is unethical to demand a strict definition of family, or of marriage simply because of how someone else 'feels' at an arbitrary point in time. Vote no. No to keep the government out of our lives. No to people who use fear as a political agenda. No to any of us--ALL of us--who do not want to be told by law what constitutes love and family. The same Christians who sell us out now are the same ones who will beg to be spared from the government later.

page 1
sort order: oldest first | newest first

Political Video Picks

 
  • Capitol Bureau Chief Laura Leslie and investigative reporter Mark Binker break down the North Carolina Senate's budget proposal.

  • The Senate budget subcommittee on health and human services gives a presentation on May 20, 2013.

  • North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper and a number of local law enforcement officials from across the state on Monday criticized…

  • Some teachers say the proposed Senate budget, which includes no pay raise for teachers and other changes to education funding, is…

  • Lawmakers called it a step toward a more expansive biometric system that would use identifiers such as fingerprints to keep track of…

  • Attorney General Roy Cooper and other law enforcement officials speak out against the Senate's budget proposal to move the SBI under…