A blogger for conservative NC think tank The John Locke Foundation is being asked to explain why she illustrated a story on President Obama's position on North Carolina's proposed marriage amendment with an altered image of Obama in chains and high heels with a bucket of fried chicken.
On Monday, "Meck Deck" blogger Tara Servatius posted a story stating that the president took a public position against the amendment to boost his chances of winning North Carolina in November. Accompanying the story was an image of the president’s face Photoshopped onto an African-American man wearing high heels and chains. Between the man's legs is a bucket of Kentucky Fried Chicken.
Update: Servatius has since resigned.
The story didn’t come to our attention till Wednesday evening, when liberal-leaning bloggers began tweeting links to it. Within an hour, the photo was removed from the story, though at the time of this post, it was still available on the think tank’s servers.
After initially posted a photo of the image along with this blogpost, WRAL News decided to remove the image because many people found it offensive.
The photo elicited a statement from state NAACP President Rev. William Barber:
"We at the NC NAACP have learned of the disgusting picture of our President on the John Locke Foundation blog and website. What we have seen so far has both racist and homophobic overtones, both of which are contrary to the fundamentals of our democracy. It's outrageous and it shows the kind of racialized, mean-spirited and divisive political attitudes that still exist in the South.
"On Thursday we will demand to know who authorized and developed such a racist and bigoted portrayal to be placed on the site of an organization that seeks to have so much influence into the shaping of public policy in NC. Whoever did it is completely over the line. It is reckless and dangerous. And should not only be an affront to the black community, the civil rights community, the LBGT community, but every North Carolinian."
John Locke Foundation President John Hood expressed regret on Facebook Wednesday night, saying he had had the photo removed from the site because it was "extremely inappropriate" and irrelevant to the content of the story. He also said he would find out how the photo got posted in the first place, and would take “appropriate action.”




![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Yeah... you're "independent". Sort of the way Obama is 'non-partisan'.
March 22, 2012 5:10 p.m.
And we have had one for over 3 yrs now. I saw the picture and thought it was absolutely hilarious.
March 22, 2012 5:07 p.m.
For those who don't know it, that amendment is not about your right to express yourself if politically correct, or in ways that most people agree with. It is expressly about your right to express opinion that may make other peoples' blood boil."
It's actually about the government, and only the government, not being able to prevent you from expressing your ideas. There is no prohibition against private infringement.
Nor does the 1st Amendment imply no negative consequences for choosing to avail one's self of speech.
March 22, 2012 5:07 p.m.
With me, you have to EARN respect. He has not by a long shot.
March 22, 2012 5:04 p.m.
March 22, 2012 4:39 p.m.
March 22, 2012 4:35 p.m.
March 22, 2012 4:33 p.m.
March 22, 2012 4:31 p.m.
March 22, 2012 4:21 p.m.
March 22, 2012 4:20 p.m.
Just because you have the 1st Amendment right to say something doesn't always mean that you should and that there aren't always consequences from it.
March 22, 2012 4:09 p.m.
Or better yet, where was the uproar in these other cartoons, the problem is there wasnt an issue behind them to push: http://www.politicsdaily.com/2009/02/19/the-five-most-racist-obama-cartoons/
March 22, 2012 4:03 p.m.
March 22, 2012 3:59 p.m.
Don't upset the money or you will be fired. Understand that all you First Amendment Scholars?
March 22, 2012 3:56 p.m.
March 22, 2012 3:36 p.m.
March 22, 2012 3:34 p.m.
March 22, 2012 3:16 p.m.
March 22, 2012 3:16 p.m.
March 22, 2012 3:14 p.m.
For those who don't know it, that amendment is not about your right to express yourself if politically correct, or in ways that most people agree with. It is expressly about your right to express opinion that may make other peoples' blood boil.
Too many have forgetten this in our politically correct society. mmancuso
Amen.... worth repeating, screaming from the rooftops.
March 22, 2012 3:09 p.m.
Two more words: civil discourse. Even Hood realized it was inappropriate and had the good manners to apologize. And some of you accuse Obama of being divisive.
March 22, 2012 3:09 p.m.
Bad taste, a misspelling, and a lie. Would you show it to your child and explain to him/her exactly what's so funny about it?
March 22, 2012 3:02 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:59 p.m.
For those who don't know it, that amendment is not about your right to express yourself if politically correct, or in ways that most people agree with. It is expressly about your right to express opinion that may make other peoples' blood boil.
Too many have forgetten this in our politically correct society.
March 22, 2012 2:55 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:51 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:51 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:50 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:49 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:44 p.m.
The NC John Locke foundation is just another politcal hack organization and is doing little to promote smaller government.
March 22, 2012 2:40 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:37 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:32 p.m.
GOOD GRIEF LOL
March 22, 2012 2:31 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:21 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:20 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:18 p.m.
Obama supporters don't even try to be honest on here anymore. * sigh
March 22, 2012 2:16 p.m.
March 22, 2012 2:13 p.m.
NOONE IS SUGGESTING THAT THIS SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.
NOBODY IS SAYING THAT SHE SHOULD BE ARRESTED.
THIS IS NOT A 1ST AMENDMENT ISSUE.
March 22, 2012 2:12 p.m.
Absolutely! thanks for asking.
March 22, 2012 2:07 p.m.
sure, you've been displaying your "integrity" on wral for years now :)
March 22, 2012 2:04 p.m.
why? because they don't filter the news through the GOP and the Churches first?
March 22, 2012 2:03 p.m.
has she been jailed? She is free to make a fool of herself if she likes but likewise has to accept the consequences of being a fool.
March 22, 2012 2:02 p.m.
March 22, 2012 1:55 p.m.
There are no issues :)
March 22, 2012 1:54 p.m.
March 22, 2012 1:44 p.m.
Deficit is up how many trillion?? 4-5T?? Gas is how much per gallon and climbing?? $4.+++. Unemployment is at 8+% and has been over 10%. To pull out and old question-Are you better off 4 years ago than you are now???
President Obama's only answer about energy is green. His only comment about gas prices is it's Bush's fault. His only comment about gov't spending is raise taxes.
President Obama said that he would be a unifier-but immediately told Congressional Republican Leaders to "be quiet-you lost".
I have a simple solution to all of this finger pointing. TALK ISSUES!! Then, race will not be an issue!!!
ABO-2012-Save America-Anybody but Obama!!
March 22, 2012 1:43 p.m.
Better than the individual he replaced, or the ones trying to replace him. Better than you in fact, NC
March 22, 2012 1:40 p.m.
March 22, 2012 1:38 p.m.
March 22, 2012 1:37 p.m.