Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

You are not logged in.

Login Options

1:25 p.m. • 9-2-10

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Scattered Clouds.
    • Hi: 92°F
    • Lo: 67°F
  • Fri.: Scattered Clouds.
    • Hi: 99°F
    • Lo: 66°F
  • Sat.: Clear.
    • Hi: 86°F
    • Lo: 57°F

Other Locations

7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Elective abortion coverage sparks debate at Wake meeting


twitter facebook golo digg e-mail print friendly
wake board

The Wake County Board of Commissioners on Monday heard from the public concerning a controversial decision to eliminate coverage of elective abortions from the health plan for county employees.

After learning from County Attorney Scott Warren that the state Supreme Court outlawed payment for the procedure by public entities in 1981, County Manager David Cooke authorized on Feb. 10 to eliminate health plan coverage for elective abortions.

The county had apparently not noticed when its provider added the elective abortions coverage to the plans it provides.

The commissioners were scheduled Monday to ratify or otherwise support the move. However, commissioners deadlocked in a three-to-three vote.

The meeting then turned into a heated public debate on the issue with supporters of the change saying taxpayers shouldn't fund abortions. Taxpayers subsidize medical policy plans for government employees.

"I think the polls are clear that the vast majority of us don't want to support the funding of elective abortions with our tax dollars,” Triangle Right to Life Chair Dorothy Yeung said.

"Anyone who is intelligent enough to be employed by Wake County is also intelligent enough to know the consequences and the blessings that accompany having sex. The choice to have a child should be made before the clothes come off,” pro-life supporter Diana Starling said.

Pro-choice supporters, however, say female employees will suffer if elective abortions are eliminated from county health coverage.

"I am appalled as a woman. This is a slap in the face to every female employee,” said Sandy Babb, with NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina.

Apex leaders voted last month to eliminate coverage of elective abortions from town employees' health insurance plans.

"We don't believe it's a proper use of public money, taxpayers' money, to fund elective abortions," Apex Mayor Keith Weatherly said.

Weatherly said the federal government does not provide elective abortion coverage for its employees and that the town's decision is in line with federal standards.

Sarah Preston, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina, said a municipality is within its means to eliminate health coverage of elective abortions. However, Preston said she thinks Wake County was bullied into the decision by Republican leaders looking to make abortion an issue at the local level. Her organization is considering legal action.

"Coverage for abortion procedures is not barred by law. In fact, to single out a service only used by women could be a violation of equal protection,” she said.

Apex and Wake County employees will still be reimbursed for abortions in cases of rape, incest or danger to the health of the mother.

Wake Commissioner Harold Webb, who is recovering from a recent stroke, was absent from Monday's vote. The commissioners could take up the issue again at a future meeting.

twitter facebook golo digg e-mail print friendly

140 Comments


Golo

Welcome to GOLO, where WRAL.com visitors can comment on stories and create profile pages, blogs and photo galleries. Read our guidelines.

View Comments VIEW ALL 140 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Nukka, wildcat,,,, what's your address. When/if my daughter gets pregnant and decides to have an abortion I would love to send the bill to y'all so you can pay it. You seem to believe abortion is a "right" for the individual but everyone else should pay for it. Why should I be forced to help kill an unborn child?

I don't want my tax dollars paying to kill an unborn child. No tax dollars should be used to support abortion.

cocker_mom, butterpie, there is nothing sensible about elective abortions. You are killing a child. Also, there is nothing about this that prevents you from getting an abortion. The taxpayers should just not pay for it. There are consequences to actions.

These Christians need to take a chill pill and stop imposing Sharia on the masses.

RB - you are likely right if that statement was applied consistently and without political or moral agendas being the driving force behind these omissions in coverage.

We should probably look at insurance as a "disaster policy" for a major medical issue - cancer, open heart surgery, etc and go back to a fee for service method for the "rest" and any maintenance type care. (My guess is that would fix many things and introduce people and Dr's to the reality of costs instead of filing a form and getting paid with no real cash outlay from the patient, etc.)

But - should I pay for a smoker's lung cancer treatment? Or a dipper's oral cancer surgery AND reconstruction (definitely elective)? Those were bad choices with very known risks. We also often pay for stupidity - jump out your window and break a leg - yup - insurance covers.

Is anyone screaming about this? no. Only elective abortions. Thus the real driving force - not the poor choices / decisions argument.

View Comments VIEW ALL 140 COMMENTS