WRAL Investigates

Internal report criticized Durham police off-duty program

Posted October 23, 2009
Updated October 24, 2009

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— An internal report completed more than a year ago noted mismanagement in the Durham Police Department's off-duty employment program, which has come under scrutiny recently because of excessive overtime paid to its former administrator.

The 63-page report, which the department released Friday after a request by WRAL News and other media outlets, questioned the supervision, policies and administration of the secondary-employment program, which coordinates off-duty jobs for officers.

Report criticizes Durham police program

The report recommended hiring a civilian to run the program, submitting detailed monthly reports, revising and updating policies, and running all payments through the city.

Police Chief Jose Lopez, who requested the study in January 2008, was out of town Friday and couldn't be reached for comment.

Beverly Thompson, a spokeswoman for the city of Durham, said a committee is working on revamping the secondary-employment program's policies and procedures and expects to have recommendations by the end of November.

Last week, the police department fired Alesha Robinson-Taylor, who administered the program. A city audit determined she had accumulated nearly $60,000 in overtime pay in 10 months.

Auditors determined that time sheets, phone records and e-mail logs couldn't substantiate the $59,545 in overtime Robinson-Taylor got between last October and July. The overtime was nearly $7,000 more than her annual salary.

Deputy Chief B.J. Council, who approved most of the overtime, is using accrued leave before her retirement takes effect Dec. 31.

Robinson-Taylor wasn't overseeing the secondary-employment program at the time the 2008 report was issued, according to Thompson.

The State Bureau of Investigation is investigating to determine if criminal charges are warranted, and the city is seeking reimbursement from Robinson-Taylor, who has appealed her termination.

3 Comments

This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • jonmariemiller Oct 23, 2009

    There was clearly a problem in this particular case, but it was not representative of the DPD. We should thank the City Manager for taking the action he did.

    It is disturbing that Council is being allowed to retire. Why was she not fired and her certification revoked? Let's hope she does not show up in a cushy job at NC Central, Duke, or some other local police department.

  • superman67112005 Oct 23, 2009

    Jack a roo

    Dont lump all LEO's in the same category. Regardless of what the public thinks......There are still those around who believe in doing what is right because it is the right thing to do. Does this stink! Yes to high heaven! It CANNOT be defended in ANY Shape Form or Fashion. Do I believe someone in the council or government needs to be asking questions of those who signed off...... Most certainly! It's not just LEO's who (some) do things wrong and are out for themselves.......there are plenty of others today (just about society as a whole) who are looking for the next turn which is going to benefit them. However, that doesn't mean EVERYONE or whatever their profession is are that particular way. JUST DO WHAT IS RIGHT and one cannot go wrong!

  • jackaroo2 Oct 23, 2009

    duh, are we surprised?