Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

2:03 p.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 41° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Tue: Chance of Rain.
    • Hi: 53° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Johnston has high rate of DWI dismissals


e-mail print friendly
WRAL Investigates
WRAL Investigates

Drunken-driving charges are dismissed twice as often in Johnston County as in most other North Carolina counties, according to state records, prompting a call from authorities for change.

Forty-six percent of the driving while impaired charges filed in Johnston County in 2006, the latest year for which records are available, were dismissed, according to the Administrative Office of Courts. Statewide, the dismissal rate for DWI charges is 21 percent. In neighboring Wake County, the dismissal rate is 20 percent.

When acquittals and pleas to reduced charges are factored in, the actual DWI conviction rate in Johnston County is about 27 percent, state records show.

"The defendants are laughing at our justice system and going right back to driving drunk again," Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell said.

Hipolito Hernandez is one of those drivers.

Hernandez, 30, of Parkertown Road in Four Oaks, had two DWI cases dismissed and a third reduced to a lesser charge in recent years. A fourth DWI charge was pending against him when he was arrested in connection with a hit-and-run that killed a 7-year-old.

Marcus Lassiter was trying to cross a road in Four Oaks on April 13 when a car hit him. He suffered brain damage and was taken off life support a few days later.

Hernandez is charged with second-degree murder, felony hit-and-run, felony assault, possession of a stolen vehicle, driving without a license, speeding and reckless driving – as well as his fifth DWI.

"It's time for the court system to do their job," Bizzell said. "Quit letting the DWIs just walk out the door."

Johnston County District Attorney Susan Doyle said she was surprised by the number of dismissed DWI cases.

"I'm frustrated," said Doyle, who was elected in 2006.

In many cases, charges were dropped when arresting officers didn't show up for court. Yet, the files often show legitimate reasons they couldn't go to court: they were in training, serving in Iraq or on vacation. One case was dismissed because the arresting officer was at a funeral, while another was tossed because a Highway Patrol trooper was at the hospital with his wife for the delivery of their baby, records show.

Chief District Judge Andy Corbett said defense attorneys "shop" for judges by trying to get on court calendars when judges they consider more lenient will be presiding in Johnston, or they seek dates when officers might not make it to court.

"I would have some problems about that," Corbett said.

WRAL tried to contact several defense attorneys who practice in Johnston County, but none returned phone calls.

In two DWI case files, trial dates had been continued so many times at the defendants' request that new court dates had to be scribbled in the margins. One defendant got 21 continuances, while the other got 18.

"Then, the one or two times that the prosecutor asked for a continuance because the officer is out of place for a legitimate reason, it's not allowed. That is disturbing," Doyle said.

"They're getting put off – some of them are getting put off way too far. But we need to look at why. What are the reasons for it so we can better deal with it?" Corbett said.

The judge called for better communication between prosecutors, officers and judges to limit the dropped cases – and possibly undo Johnston County's reputation for being lenient on drunken driving.

RELATED TOPICS: Johnston County, Wake County

e-mail print friendly

83 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 83 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
nccopper You post says it all. Thanks for the info.

Here is the DWI law for NC. pay close attention to section 20-138.1 paragraph 2. That is all the evidence needed to CONVICT ! the judges obviously don't interpret the language of the law.

20‑138.1. Impaired driving.

(a) Offense. – A person commits the offense of impaired driving if he drives any vehicle upon any highway, any street, or any public vehicular area within this State:

(1) While under the influence of an impairing substance; or

(2) After having consumed sufficient alcohol that he has, at any relevant time after the driving, an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more. The results of a chemical analysis shall be deemed sufficient evidence to prove a person's alcohol concentration; or

(3) With any amount of a Schedule I controlled substance, as listed in G.S. 90‑89, or its metabolites in his blood or urine.

Under North Carolina Law, judges can't be sued for their past rulings. So just remember, to vote in November. The only way we are going to get new judges is to vote new ones into office. Same goes for the District Attorney, although she is not up for re-election for 2 more years.

DWI shouldn't even be defensible. You either blew over the legal limit or your blood tested over the legal limit. Cut and dried. There should be minimum punishment for first offense and permenant revocation of your license for the 2nd.

It is funny that this story was run when it was. I was in court in Johnston County on Wednesday of last week. I was there with someone else who had a speeding ticket there. At one point and time the Assistant District Attorney for the day told all of Law Enforcement to leave for the day because there were no trials for that day. It was about 10:30. About 45 minutes later an attorney was there with his client asking for a trial. Of course all the officers were told to leave.

The case was thrown out. The defense attorneys are to blame for continuing cases and mess like that, but there is no way the DA that day should have told them to leave. What did she think was going to happen.

LS

View Comments VIEW ALL 83 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here