Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

9:39 p.m. • 5-25-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sun: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 75° F
  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 80° F
  • Tue: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 85° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2011-03-17 15:28:00
Updated: 2011-03-17 19:07:29

Group criticizes Progress Energy's nuclear operations


Progress Energy Hopes to Expand Nuclear Plant
Progress Energy Hopes to Expand Nuclear Plant
print friendly

Progress Energy's nuclear generating plants experienced the most near-mishaps last year of any utility in the U.S., according to a report released Thursday.

The report from the Union of Concerned Scientists comes as Japanese officials try to stabilize nuclear reactors damaged last week by a massive earthquake and tsunami.

The UCS, an environmental advocacy and watchdog group, said that Progress Energy and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission need to exercise more oversight to improve the performance of the Raleigh-based utility's plants.

"While the company may simply have had an unlucky year, corporate-wide approaches to safety may have contributed to this poor performance," the report said. "When conditions trigger special inspections at more than one plant with the same owner, the NRC should formally evaluate whether corporate policies and practices contributed to the shortcomings."

Progress Energy spokesman Mike Hughes defended the company's safety record.

"(Nuclear plants) have been demonstrated as safe for more than 40 years. We've been operating plants since 1971 in the Carolinas, and those plants have been very, very safe," Hughes said.

He did acknowledge, however, that the company's nuclear plants had their share of problems last year.

"2010 was clearly not a banner year in those terms, and we certainly didn't perform to the level we know our regulators expect (and) that we expect of ourselves," he said.

The UCS noted Progress Energy plants in Southport and in South Carolina and Florida accounted for four of 14 incidents nationwide that led to special inspections by the NRC.

Two of the incidents occurred at the H.B. Robinson plant in Florence, S.C., last March and October. The UCS compared the incidents, an electrical fire and an equipment failure, to those that led to the near-meltdown at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania in 1979.

At the Brunswick plant in Southport, workers couldn't respond quickly to an alarm last June, the report state. At the Crystal River plant in Crystal River, Fla., workers caused $500 million in damage to a reactor's concrete containment building when installing a new generator, according to the report.

"(Inspectors) provided input into what we needed to respond to, what we needed to address, what we needed to improve on," Hughes said. "We've taken steps and continue to take steps to address all of them."

The Shearon Harris nuclear plant in southwest Wake County was the only Progress Energy plant not named in the UCS report.

Charlotte-based Duke Energy, which is in the process of acquiring Progress Energy, was cited in the report for a security problem at its Catawba plant in Rock Hill, S.C.

UCS noted that none of last year's safety problems caused harm to plant employees or the public, but they expressed concern that regulators appeared to tolerate unresolved safety issues in several cases.


61 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 61 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
There will always be a bunch of "chicken littles" running around thinking the sky is falling .... mostly they just like the attention

The disaster at Fuukushima Dai-ichi illustrates how we graduallky start to overlook things that are risks after we become accustomed to them.

Like overloaded fuel storage, held stable with borates. We then start ignoring the risk of the overloading - without realizing we have added a point of failure.

An objective look at Progress's nuclear operations is worthwhile. It's not hard to miss some risks because you're standing too close to see. I'd like to see teams of Navy reactor officers do an 'inspector general' tour in the US.

Rules of Corporatons:

1) profit comes first.

2) Safety should not interfere with profits.

If these Liberal special interest groups like UCS had there way we would be like Gilligan's Island Peddling Bicycles to make power. All these whiny special interest groups live for things like this.

Also, the reactors in Japan were not affected directly from the earthquake or tsunami. The earthquake that hit Japan was 1000 times stronger than the one that hit Haiti and yet these reactors were unphased. The tsunami knocked out electricity which controls the pumps for cooling and the generators did not have the right outfit to hook into the plant's power system. Those generators are also about 5th in line in redundancy. When designing reactors, you really don't ever think that you will get to the 4th or 5th stage of redundancy. However, the USA can learn to extend redundancy to the 5th or even 6th stage to prevent this from happening in the event of a major catastrophe.

If I remember correctly, there is also a barium override that can be injected into the reactor to stop the fission process. They have already trashed the reactor with salt water, did the barium override get knocked out with the electricity as well?

View Comments VIEW ALL 61 COMMENTS