Local News

Cook jurors wanted lengthier sentence

Posted March 1, 2011
Updated March 2, 2011

— Members of the jury that convicted a Raleigh doctor in the September 2009 drunk driving death of ballerina Elena Bright Shapiro said Tuesday they were upset that a more-lengthy sentence wasn’t an option.

Jurors found Raymond Cook guilty of involuntary manslaughter, felony death by motor vehicle and driving while impaired earlier Tuesday, after 11 hours of deliberations over three days. By law, Cook could only be sentenced on one of the charges.

Superior Court Judge W. Osmond Smith III sentenced Cook to between 36 months and 53 months in prison – the maximum allowed – for the felony death by motor vehicle charge because the jury agreed with the prosecution that an aggravating factor existed.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys both agreed that Cook, a former facial plastic surgeon, was drunk and driving at least 75 mph in a 45-mph speed zone on the evening of Sept. 11, 2009, when he crashed into the back of Shapiro's Hyundai Elantra at Strickland and Lead Mine roads in Raleigh. 

The state argued that in addition to charges of driving while impaired and felony death by motor vehicle, Cook was guilty of second-degree murder.

Jurors said they wearily agreed to convict Cook of involuntary manslaughter only after two of the 12 jurors refused to convict on second-degree murder.

“Two of the jurors just could not agree. Everything was ‘What if, what if,’ and they would not look at the facts,” juror Wendy Smith said.

Smith felt Cook deserved to be in jail for life.

“He knowingly sped through an intersection with a very high chance that he would take a life. So, we felt like second-degree murder was very appropriate," she said.

Jury foreman Andrew Miller said deliberations were intense.

"Towards the end, it did become very emotional for people," he said.

Cook was sentenced following heartfelt pleas from Shapiro’s family.

"It was no accident. It wasn't just a wreck. It was a deliberate act. It was a deliberate act by Dr. Cook who knew better, but chose to get into that lethal weapon and kill our darling Elena," Shapiro's aunt, Annie Bright, said to the judge.

Shapiro's parents also spoke to the judge.

"It's obvious to me that Cook is a narcissist whose only concern is for himself," Shapiro's father, David Shapiro, said.

Brantly Shapiro spoke about the loss of her daughter.

"When something like this happens, you feel like you failed to keep them safe," she said.

Bright said she wished that Cook's family members, who knew he had a drinking problem, had taken the car "keys away from him a long time ago."

During the sentencing hearing, prosecutors argued that Cook's sentence should be increased due to a DWI and speeding arrest in Georgia in 1989 where Cook pleaded no contest.

Prosecutors also played a DVD tribute to Shapiro which was shown during her memorial service. The video showed Shapiro throughout her dancing career, performing and posing for photos with family and friends.

During the video, Cook could be seen crying for the first time during the trial.

Defense attorneys submitted character references from Cook’s colleagues and patients, in addition to proof that Cook completed a drug and alcohol treatment program. The defense said Cook was randomly tested for alcohol use multiple times by the program and was shown to be clean.

They said Cook was randomly tested for alcohol use multiple times by the program and was shown to be clean.

He has not had alcohol since the incident and regularly attends Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, in addition to meeting with an addiction psychologist, his attorneys said.

They also said Cook voluntarily resigned from his medical position following the incident.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Ugum Mar 8, 2011

    The Shapiros really need to get on with their lives and leave Cook alone.

  • FTimePlayer Mar 4, 2011

    bbam, pls check your decimal place....

  • bbam Mar 3, 2011

    The DUI laws need to be based on complete, accurate, empirical data which is something that simply put does not exist. I have no idea if the bottom DUI limit needs to be higher or lower but i do think a graduated scale that reflects the magnitude of risk caused by driving after consuming alcohol, say driving with a .015 versus .08, should be taken into account.

    Every time i read about another fatal automobile accident caused by a drunk driver the BAC always seems to be in the .015 and up range, with most close to or above .02. I know that observation is anecdotal and contrary to asking for more stringent reporting of highway fatalities but as of now the highway statistics report only "alcohol related" deaths which means a sober person who runs a stop light and kills a driver who has had a beer or two is one of the 15,000 or so motor vehicle alcohol related deaths reported every year. Even if all of the drivers are sober but a passenger is not or a police officer puts "alcohol rela

  • wildcat Mar 3, 2011


  • _kommon_sense_ Mar 3, 2011

    If only 30% believe was proven then why did 83% of the jury think it was proven?

  • AF Flight Nurse Mar 3, 2011

    From a conscience point of view, no one won in this scenario. Truthfully, we should pray for everyone of them to include the jurors and the judge. They all had a horrible job. Sincerely.

  • Go Figure Mar 2, 2011

    I just noticed Cook was not wearing his wedding ring the day the jury came back from deliberations. Did u suppose he knew he was going to prison?

  • glarg Mar 2, 2011

    "I don't understand why the 10 jurors didn't hold out. If only 2 were wanting this sentence, it doesn't make any sense. I think the 10 were right on the money. Can somebody explain this?"

    Hold out for what, exactly?

    North Carolina requires that these jury verdicts be unanimous the jury returned the verdicts that there was unanimous agreement on.

    At most "holding out" would have resulted in a one day delay before the judge declared a hung jury and end the trial without a verdict being entered. I guess in your "scored earth" philosophy there would have been no verdict on any charge.

    Cook would be free and the Shapiro would be forced to sit through another 2 week trial 6 months from now. Any BTW, you can see from this board about 30% of people dont believe that malice can be proven in this case, so you would most likely end up in the same situation. All to please you.

  • Southern Girl Mar 2, 2011

    I don't understand why the 10 jurors didn't hold out. If only 2 were wanting this sentence, it doesn't make any sense. I think the 10 were right on the money. Can somebody explain this?

    Truthfully, Cook will have to live with himself for the rest of his life, because he knows he murdered this beautiful young girl just as much as if he had shot her. Suppose this had happened to one of his daughters - would he be happy with the verdict? I seriously doubt it.

    I feel so sorry for Elena's family, because justice certainly was not served.

  • DontLikeTheSocialistObama Mar 2, 2011

    Cook got off because he's wealthy.

    If he been a common man he would be jail for murder for a long time.