Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

4:21 a.m. • 5-18-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 82° F
  • Sun: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 78° F
  • Mon: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 80° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2011-02-09 09:34:00
Updated: 2011-02-09 18:42:56

State, ACLU settle privacy lawsuit over Amazon customers' info


Amazon.com
Amazon.com
print friendly

The North Carolina Department of Revenue has settled a privacy lawsuit with the American Civil Liberties Union and has agreed to stop asking for the personal information of Amazon.com customers, officials said Wednesday.

Amazon has been fighting for months with the state, which wanted detailed records of what customers in North Carolina have purchased since 2003 so that it could collect an estimated $50 million in sales and use taxes.

The online retail giant provided the state with details about purchases without identifying which customer bought what, but the state wanted names and addresses linked to the purchases.

In a lawsuit, Amazon argued the request violated customers’ privacy because the state would be able to determine their buying patterns. The ACLU later joined Amazon in the fight.

"The N.C. Department of Revenue does not need access to private customer records that reveal which specific customers in North Carolina have ordered which specific books, music, or movies in order to complete its audit of Amazon and collect any taxes owed,” Jennifer Rudinger, executive director of the ACLU of North Carolina, said in a statement Wednesday.

“We are pleased that the public’s First Amendment rights have been upheld by this settlement, which prohibits the department from seeking this kind of information from Amazon or other Internet retailers in the future," Rudinger said.

Amazon wasn't part of the settlement, Rudinger said, and it was unclear Wednesday whether the company's lawsuit over the Revenue Department's audit of its sales in North Carolina was pending on appeal.

In October, U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman ruled that the state’s request for customer data went too far and "runs afoul of the First Amendment” and that there was “no legitimate need” for the state to know what customers purchased.

"The fear of government tracking and censoring one’s reading, listening and viewing choices chills the exercise of First Amendment rights,” Pechman wrote in her ruling.

Beth Stevenson, spokeswoman for the Revenue Department, said Wednesday that the settlement with the ACLU reinforces the argument that the state was never interested in people's buying patterns.

"The case between the North Carolina Department of Revenue and Amazon has long been twisted into something it is not. Bottom line, this is about fairly collecting the tax that is due to the state of North Carolina and nothing more," Stevenson said in a statement.

Pechman's ruling upheld the state's right to collect sales tax and the necessary information to do so, Stevenson said.

"The department has always maintained that we do not need – or want – titles or similar details about products purchased by Amazon customers. The department voluntarily destroyed the detailed information that Amazon unnecessarily provided and offered them the opportunity to comply with the state tax laws moving forward," she said.

"The lawsuit on this particular issue could have been avoided altogether if not for the aggressive stance Amazon took to avoid compliance with North Carolina’s tax laws," she said. "There would have never been an issue of customer privacy if Amazon would simply collect the North Carolina sales tax that others already do."

The Revenue Department also faces a lawsuit from several online travel companies over a recent change to the state tax code.

Orbitz, Travelocity.com, Hotels.com, Hotwire Inc., Travelscape and Trip Network Inc. allege in their lawsuit that the state and counties want to collect sales and occupancy taxes on the fees the firms charge customers to book cheap hotel rooms. They maintain that the state law violates federal law governing online commerce and arbitrarily changes the contracts they have with hotels in North Carolina, and they want a judge to void the law.


113 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 113 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Overstock.com is collecting sales tax now! Thanks Bev! Now do you still want the use tax on top of that sales tax?

Overstock: "Sales tax will be charged to all orders that are processed with a North Carolina shipping address, regardless of the location the product ships from. Remote sellers, such as Internet retailers and catalog companies are required to collect taxes in states where the company has a physical presence. Due to a recent change in North Carolina, we are collecting sales tax at check-out for orders shipping to North Carolina. North Carolina charges tax on shipping costs."

So can we give more tax breaks to the ultra rich now? Its obvious that they really need it and every time the right wingers give it to them the economy just SOARS in response, right?

""Here's a hint...rich people are rich for one reason and it's a primary one; THEY DON'T PAY TAXES!!! Get it?"" A Golo ignoramus

If this were true then the guy making $60k and brings home $43k would be rich if he just kept the whole $60k. That is ignorance gone to seed.

For the benefit of those reading allow me to correct this statement. Rich people are rich for one reason and it's a primary one: The use the 24 hours they get each day differently than poor people. They behave differently because they think differently.

The more taxes a government collects, the more they want. It is all about greedy politicians.

For that matter, I sell things to the State of NC and they certainly don't PAY sales tax... "Tax Exempt" status is what they give themselves. Crock!

Why would they pay tax to themselves? There is no crock, you just didn't think about it. If they did pay tax to themselves, they would not have any more or less revenue, probably less because it takes administrative costs to collect the tax that they had paid to themselves. Are you in favor of more beaurocracy with no purpose? Also the state has expenses that it must pay just to enable you to earn an income. It also has expenses when you want to buy something. Health inspectors aren't free. Roads aren't free. High school education isn't free.

View Comments VIEW ALL 113 COMMENTS