Local News

State panel grills SBI chief about pace of reform

Posted December 7, 2010

— Months after the State Bureau of Investigation said it would implement a series of improvements to correct problems in its blood analysis unit, members of a special legislative committee appeared Tuesday to be losing patience.

An independent review released in August found 190 cases that resulted in convictions from 1987 to 2003 in which SBI agents in the crime lab's blood-stain analysis unit omitted, overstated or falsely reported information about blood evidence.

Following that review, the crime lab director was removed, and Attorney General Roy Cooper ordered audits of other parts of the lab. Defense attorneys are questioning the credibility of the SBI in court, and some lawmakers have said that the lab might need to be removed from SBI control.

On Tuesday, SBI Director Greg McLeod updated a legislative committee on the search for a new crime lab director, but lawmakers and other committee peppered him with questions about the slow pace of reform.

"We're hearing they're working on it, they're working on it. But I think what the committee is looking for is some idea of how long it's going to take for them to work on it," said Christine Mumma, a committee member and the executive director of the North Carolina Center on Actual Innocence.

The committee asked McLeod about future time-lines and progress, but some members said they felt he was evasive and not forthcoming.

"In the interest of time, if we could go to the part of what Ms. Mumma was actually asking about," state Rep. Paul Stam told McLeod.

SBI; State Bureau of Investigation State panel grills SBI chief about pace of reform

Stam, R-Wake, and others said they expected to be further along in the search of a new lab director.

"It's going slower than we all hoped," he said.

McLeod said he is satisfied with the SBI's methodical review of its operations.

"What I don't want to do is focus on speed or rush to judgment in any way. I want to make good decisions," he said.

He said a search firm should help identify the next director within 90 days. To find the best candidate, he said, the State Personnel Office agreed to increase the top end of the pay range for the position from $107,000 to $115,000 a year.

McLeod said he believes the SBI is making strides to improve public confidence.

"We do have an acting lab director. We're doing a full lab review of all the sections in the lab," he said.

Yet, what concerned some committee members are the decisions they haven't seen from the new leadership.

"Some of the members wanted to know more about the future than the past," Stam said.

"What I'm not hearing is how the culture is really going to change, and that's what needs to change. The message from the top all the way down," Mumma said.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Glenn Miller Dec 8, 2010

    pbjbeach, they are accepting applications and resumes. Please feel free to send yours in.

  • pbjbeach Dec 8, 2010

    In my personal estimation he is just attempting to drag this issue out until such time as that they feel that the general public has forgotten the issue as whole an then they will quietly claim that they have resolved the issue an that it will never happen again an then things will go on just as before hand with the prosecutors contuinue to acheive false convictions base of faulity trumped up untrustworthy evidence to be able to keep their conviction rates up. the people of this state an nation need to feel that they have the fairly an justily prosecuted an convicted the guilty an an have trutful an fairly released the innocent as well . in onther word we need to be able to trust the prosecutors to do their jobs in a fair na even hande manner an act justifiably under the laws of this state an the constiutution of this nation thank you

  • wayneboyd Dec 8, 2010

    Government thinking, I see they're going to increase the directors pay by $8.000.00 they don't have and no telling how much we taxpayers are going to have to cough up to satisfy those who will be found innocent by the courts because of incompentency. And we'll probably go through this again in about ten years when they discover that the "NEW" guy didn't know his behind from a whole in the ground either.