Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

6:02 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Judge has questions about Cooper's statements


e-mail print friendly
brad cooper
brad cooper

A judge on Tuesday wanted to know if statements submitted to police by the attorneys for Brad Cooper, a Cary man accused of killing his wife more than two years ago, actually came from Cooper.

Cooper has told investigators that his wife, Nancy Cooper, went jogging on the morning of July 12, 2008, and never returned home.

A man walking his dog two days later found the body of the 34-year-old mother-of-two in an undeveloped subdivision less than 3 miles from the Coopers’ Lochmere home.

An autopsy determined that she had likely been strangled.

Brad Cooper was arrested in October 2008 and charged with first-degree murder.

On Tuesday, Brad Cooper told Judge Paul Gessner that the statements, submitted to police before his arrest, were made by him.

Another issue discussed were e-mails exchanged between Brad Cooper and his attorneys. His attorney argued that they the e-mails, which are located on a computer purchased after police searched Cooper's home, are privileged communication, but prosecutors say some of the e-mails might be evidence.

Gessner has assigned a third party to look over the e-mails. No decision was made on whether the e-mails should be turned over to the prosecution for discovery before Brad Cooper's Oct. 25 trial.

On Friday, Brad Cooper's attorneys will be back in court as they argue a motion for a change of trial venue.

The attorneys contend that local news reports, specifically those of WRAL News and The News & Observer, could keep their client from getting a fair trial in Wake County.

According to the motion, "extensive pre-trial publicity" might give jurors "preconceived impressions" of the case. Cooper's attorneys called the coverage of his case "inflammatory" and "prejudiced" regarding his potential guilt.

As police investigated Nancy Cooper's homicide in 2008, her family successfully fought a public battle for custody of the couple's two daughters. It included testimony from family and friends who asserted their beliefs that Brad Cooper killed his wife and claims that he had been emotionally abusive to her in the weeks before her death.

RELATED TOPICS: Wake County, Cary

e-mail print friendly

22 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 22 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
You haven't 'seen' evidence of his guilt because neither the police nor the DA have released any details of what they have in the case. You will not find out what the evidence is until the prosecution presents the evidence at trial. Based on how many of these cases go, during the trial you will likely see evidence of one or more of the following: forensic evidence linking the perp to the crime (& crime scene), timeline evidence, evidence of motive, etc. Whether or not you believe there is enough to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt remains to be seen, but no one can make a determination before seeing what the evidence is in this case. One thing is certain though--the DA's office fully believes they have enough evidence to prove Cooper's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We will soon see for ourselves.

He has not been found guilty yet...that remains to be seen

My comment stands, and any mature adult knows how to take it.

"...Your comment about being on the roof of the jail was just plain stupid."

Really? You're the one who said you would be screaming from the rooftops, were you not? He is in jail, isn't he?

IMO, he has had ample opportunities to establish his innocence long before he was arrested. IF he was innocent he could have proven it before now, obviously he cant. Your comment about being on the roof of the jail was just plain stupid.

View Comments VIEW ALL 22 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here