Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

9:09 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

DNA sample testing system expanded in new N.C. law


e-mail print friendly
DNA testing
DNA testing

North Carolina's criminal DNA testing system will be expanded with Gov. Bev Perdue signing a bill Thursday that supporters say will help prevent crime and help solve cold cases.

The measure directs police, starting Feb. 1, to take DNA samples of suspects facing certain felony charges, such as murder, rape and other serious crimes.

The samples will be entered into the state's DNA database and ran against DNA evidence in unsolved crimes.

“These samples are the 21st century version of fingerprints,” Perdue said at a bill-signing ceremony in Greenville. “We need to give our law enforcement officers the most advanced tools that we can when they head out on the streets.”

The state already takes a sample when someone is convicted of a felony, but Attorney General Roy Cooper says the new law will expand the DNA database and help solve crimes more quickly – an estimated 100 in the first year.

"It's a win for North Carolina citizens," Cooper said.

Some lawmakers, however, say requiring the sample upon arrest amounts to unreasonable search and seizure.

“I feel like it's unfair. I think it may be a type of targeting that we don't intend for it to be,” said Rep. Rosa Gill, D-Wake, who voted against the bill.

Concerns from lawmakers and advocacy groups prompted changes to the original bill, which required samples from anyone arrested on a felony charge.

The law only calls for samples from those committing certain felonies – specifically violent and sex-related crimes – including murder, manslaughter, rape, assault with a deadly weapon, burglary, breaking and entering, armed robbery, cyberstalking and stalking.

The bill also allows for removing a person's DNA from the state database if he or she is acquitted or the charge is dropped.

Federal funds will be used to pay for a portion of the DNA testing.

Eight additional forensic criminal analysts are expected to be hired to analyze and review samples, distribute swab collection kits to law enforcement and help with training.

RELATED TOPICS: Beverly Perdue

e-mail print friendly

89 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 89 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
How many of you would turn in a member of your own family? I would, but that is primarily because of what I do for a living.

How many of you would like to be questioned and possibly convicted for something done by a brother or sister?

Well, DNA can make that mistake. If not tested or read properly, familial matches can sometimes incriminate the wrong person.

Fingerprints never lie, and, can't tell anything else about you like DNA can. And figerprint information is of little interest to healthcare agencies and other such organizations.

CHALLENGE IT NOW!!!!!!!

Maybe now they will be able to solve old crime cases as well as new ones quickly. wildct

In case you missed it...no they won't. and do you really really think that every crime involves snippets of tissue and can be neatly tidied up at the end of the episode

Maybe now they will be able to solve old crime cases as well as new ones quickly.

Investigators shouldn't have to wait until conviction to get DNA, but they also shouldn't be able to get DNA from everyone charged with a felony. If DNA is relevant, then they should get a warrant to "search" for DNA, just like they would need to get a warrant to search a home. If there is no DNA evidence in the case at hand, then no DNA sample should be collected. If we start collecting DNA samples from everyone charged with a felony on the off chance it will match another unrelated case, I'm afraid it won't be long before we start collecting DNA from other groups "just in case."

Here.....just to let you know Wiki is well, Wiki

View Comments VIEW ALL 89 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here