Local News

Smithsonian to examine remains thought to be of pirate

Posted June 18, 2010
Updated June 19, 2010

— Descendants of a Colonial-era resident of Bath who is thought to have once sailed with the famous pirate Blackbeard took possession of his remains Friday.

The bones were uncovered in 1986 during a construction project on the shores of Bath Creek and have been kept in storage by the state Department of Cultural Resources ever since.

Raleigh researcher and Outer Banks historian Kevin Duffus said he thinks the bones are the remains of Edward Salter, a barrel-maker forced into piracy. 

"A pirate for 11 months, mostly against his will. He sailed with Blackbeard,” he said.

Duffus said Salter's name is on a document listing rewards for the capture of pirates. He was arrested in Bath after Blackbeard's death in 1718 and taken to Williamsburg, Va., to be executed.

"All the historians and records indicate that he was actually hanged,” Duffus said. However, Duffus also found another document that states that Salter was given a pardon.

Duffus said he thinks that after sailing with Blackbeard on the Queen Anne’s Revenge, Salter became a merchant in Bath and died unexpectedly after a brief illness in January 1735.

For more than two decades, Duffus said Salter's remains have been in storage in Raleigh. Then a few years ago, Duffus located some of Salter's descendants, and they came forward asking for the bones.

"I think he (Salter) is ready to get out of that warehouse and go back home,” said Brian Blount, a ninth-great grandson of Salter.

However, State Archaeologist Steve Claggett said he has doubts that the remains found along Bath Creek belonged to Salter.

"The connection, as far as I know, cannot be proved based on documents," Claggett said.

Virginia Bass, of Rogersville, Mo., an eighth-generation descendant of Salter, went to the North Carolina Office of State Archeology Research Center in Raleigh Friday to take possession of the bones.

The bones were then transported to the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History. The descendants have asked the museum to look into their claim and test the bones for clues to the physical activities, place of birth, age and cause of death.

After the tests are complete, the bones will be returned to Bath for reburial in October.

"This is a very significant figure in North Carolina colonial history who deserves to be recognized and remembered and be buried decently," Duffus said.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • thelostlight Jun 23, 2010

    Congratulations "froggy2" on joining GOLO just in time to comment on this story. The reason that the descendants believe that the remains belong to Salter is because the State Archaeologist's office said so in a memo dated May 8, 1986. The DCR memo stated: "Archaeologists feel confident that the 18th century burial represents remains of Edward Salter Sr. who died in 1734." Furthermore, if the State Archaeologist was not confident of the identity of the remains, the transfer of the remains to Salter's descendants would have been unlawful.

  • froggy2 Jun 21, 2010

    I am curious as to what Mr. Duffus' qualifications are? The article states that Mr. Duffus "thinks" that the remains belong to Edward Salter, while the state archaeologist clearly states that the connection "cannot be proved". So the remains of somebody who may not even be Edward Salter, were handed over to people who may or may not be related to the deceased? What if it isn't Salter?