Local News

N.C. Supreme Court to hear 'life' sentences case

Posted January 28, 2010

— North Carolina's highest court will hear arguments next month about two convicted murderers who argue that the life sentences they received in the 1970s are now complete, officials said Thursday.

Shaula Brannan, assistant clerk at the state Supreme Court, said the court has scheduled arguments in the cases of Alford Jones and Faye Brown for Feb. 16. A judge ruled in December that both Jones and Brown should be immediately set free, although state lawyers have managed to keep them behind bars by appealing the cases.

Dozens of convicts who were sentenced to life between 1974 and 1978 received terms defined as no more than 80 years long. Jones and Brown contend sentence-reduction credits mean they've completed their punishment. State attorneys claim the credits they've received behind bars should not be used to reduce their prison terms.

More than two dozen inmates could immediately qualify for release if the state is forced to apply credits earned behind bars to reduce the length of sentences. Many more could be released in the months and years to come.

While the state attorney general's office has suffered a string of court losses in trying to keep the inmates in custody, they did win favor with one judge. Superior Court Judge Gentry Caudill determined last month that the Department of Correction secretary has discretion in how to award good behavior credits, and said the secretary has decided not to apply those discounts to release the "life" prisoners early.

Brown is currently being held at Raleigh Correctional Center for Women. She was sentenced for her role in the shooting death of a state trooper during a bank robbery in 1975.

Jones is currently at New Hanover Correctional Center in Wilmington. He was convicted in the January 1975 shooting of William B. Turner Sr.

7 Comments

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Oldest First
View all
  • disgruntled Jan 29, 2:45 p.m.

    These people were originally sentenced to DEATH! Commuting their sentences to life should still mean they leave prison when they are DEAD!

  • chfdcpt Jan 29, 9:23 a.m.

    Actually itls, the problem is with the knuckleheads legislature in those years. At that time, life expectancy was around 75, so they made life sentence to mean 80 years.

    If there is any incompetence in this issue, it rests with the legislature. They are the ones that come up with the laws, yet they don't review what is in the current codes.

    What should scare you folks more than anything else is that we have an elected governor that is spouting that she does not care what the law says about this issue. The next law she does not care about could be the one that affects you directly.

  • WHEEL Jan 29, 8:56 a.m.

    All those geniuses in the Legislature and high paid administrators in the Dept. of Corrections that cannot pass or enforce a simple LIFE SENTENCE law is a furthur embarassement to a State with plenty to go around already.

  • gm Jan 28, 7:54 p.m.

    "If they aint DEAD, the LIFE sentence has NOT been carried out."

    lol, you beat me to it!

  • Geminigirl Jan 28, 7:44 p.m.

    If they aint DEAD, the LIFE sentence has NOT been carried out.

    A LIFE sentence means you are CARRIED out of the prison in a prone position.

  • Eightball Jan 28, 6:14 p.m.

    The people they killed were given a sentence...NO LIFE, forever & ever...why should they be given the chance to resume theirs???

  • ranquick Jan 28, 5:44 p.m.

    I DO NOT understand ...to me LIFE means LIFE