Incoming board members call for halt to proposed school

Raleigh, N.C. — A day after securing a majority on the Wake County Board of Education, a slate of incoming board members have called on the current board to stop work on a planned high school northeast of Raleigh.

Forest Ridge High School has been a sore point for neighbors, who are concerned about traffic and the impact on their community, and Wake County commissioners, who are upset over the rising cost of site development work.

Board member Ron Margiotta and incoming board members Chris Malone, John Tedesco, Deborah Prickett and Debra Goldman sent a letter to the school board Wednesday "requesting a stop to H6," the district's internal code for the planned school.

"We need to go forward in a judicious and thoughtful manner on any policy change," the letter said, "(but we should) suspend any future or currently planned spending on the H6 site, whether direct or indirect."

The Wake County school district a year ago purchased a site near the intersection of Forestville and Louisburg roads for the school, which is being designed for more than 2,200 students. Construction is set to begin next summer.

County commissioners have complained about the cost of clearing rocks from the site and building roads to it. Nearby residents and officials in Rolesville said the school should be built on a site about 3 miles away, saying it has better access to roads and wouldn't disrupt traffic on smaller side streets.

Wake school officials have said that going with another site could delay the opening of the high school by at least a year, which would delay any relief to overcrowding at other high schools.

The incoming board members said the district needs to listen to the public concerns about the planned Forest Ridge High site and halt all work on it to give another look to alternative sites.

"Sometimes, regardless of what one might believe is a good policy or program, when the people speak loudly enough, it is our job, that being the board and the staff, to amend our goals and to listen and act," the letter said.

The four new board members – three were elected in October, and Tedesco won a runoff election on Tuesday – don't take office until next month. Together with Margiotta, they have called for changes to the school district's student assignment policies and have promised to be responsive to parental and community concerns.

78 Comments

WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

VIEW ALL 78 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments

How much money has been spent to date on this new school. What penalties ($$$) will be involved by canceling it.

Eduardo1
November 5, 2009 7:51 p.m.

I'll bet that once the realities of managing a large and still growing public school system settle in on the new school board, there will be fewer opportunities for the changes campaigned for. The fact is, there are a limited number of available classroom seats and when one school is at 80% capacity and another is at 115% the parents of the area will be unhappy. I also believe that the site improvement costs and facilities maintenance of building one large school will be less, on a per student basis, than a multitude of tiny schools scattered throughout the county. Even with the new board, there will be trailers, there will be busing, and there will be unhappy citizens. I am not saying the current school board has not made errors, but they have had to make the most of limited resources (including land available for purchase) - that is the reason for the year round schools, the reassignments and all of these other things nobody likes. Supporting the board, but hope they don't mess up.

Great Dane Guy
November 5, 2009 6:09 p.m.

Seems like they want to do the right thing in making the right decisions. Sometime one can be to quick in decision making, and have regrets later. They have their reasons. Wait and see how it all plays out.

wildcat
November 5, 2009 4:44 p.m.

ncwebguy - "The rest of the county (including Garner) will get trailers while their tax dollars are funneled westward."

There are trailers on some of the school campuses in Apex and Cary.

And you do realize that some of the students educated in Apex and Cary are inner city kids, while some of the Apex/Cary kids have been attending inner city schools, right.

So, up til now, what did it matter where a school was physically located???

God bless.

RB

Spirit Warrior Woman - Rev. RB
November 5, 2009 4:39 p.m.

"use existing vacant commerical properties"

That is sometimes done, like when Cary middle school students were bussed to a commercial building in Apex for a while. Don't know if it's still being done.

But it can't ALWAYS be done, because sometimes those vacant spaces don't have the safety items dealt with the way they would be in a school for children.

God bless.

RB

Spirit Warrior Woman - Rev. RB
November 5, 2009 4:37 p.m.