Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

5:38 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Judge: Police video in UNC student's death to remain sealed


e-mail print friendly
Courtland Smith, UNC student killed by Archdale officer
Courtland Smith, UNC student killed by Archdale officer

A Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday against media efforts to obtain footage from a police video camera showing the events leading up to the fatal shooting of a University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill student last month.

WRAL News, The Associated Press and UNC's student newspaper, The Daily Tar Heel, are among several media outlets that sought to make the evidence public.

Courtland Smith, a junior biology major from Houston, Texas, was killed early Aug. 23 after a police confrontation following a 911 call during which the 21-year-old repeatedly asked a Guilford County dispatcher to send help.

Archdale police stopped Smith on southbound Interstate 85 in Randolph County. A police report said Officer Jeremy Flinchum shot Smith after a confrontation.

In a 911 recording released by Guilford Metro 911, Smith said he was headed to Asheville. He told a dispatcher that he was drunk, had a 9-mm pistol with him and was trying to kill himself.

An officer can be heard in the 911 recording yelling at Smith to stay in the car, and the caller can be heard later saying, "I've got to pull something out."

The recording ends before the shooting, and the rest of the recording, as well as video footage from the dashboard camera of Flinchum's patrol car, have been sealed by court order.

Judge Brad Long reviewed the video and decided that releasing it would jeopardize the investigation.

"The need for a complete investigation into the death of a young college student shot on the side of the road in the middle of the night or the right of the state of North Carolina to potentially prosecute someone for the death of another without having that right jeopardized or the right of the potential defendant to a fair trial when facing severe penalties are paramount and far outweigh the need of the public to review the actions of its agencies," Long wrote in his seven-page ruling.

Prosecutors had argued that the video isn't public record under state law and should remain under seal until the investigation of the case is completed.

North Carolina has never had a case dealing specifically with the release of dashboard camera video. The state's law outlining what items in a criminal investigation are public record was written before cameras were widely used in officers' cars.

The State Bureau of Investigation is reviewing the case, which is customary procedure in officer-involved shootings. Flinchum is on paid leave pending the outcome of the investigation.

RELATED TOPICS: Guilford County, Randolph County

e-mail print friendly

17 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 17 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
The police should have never showed or released any of the video period.

Since they released some of it, the Judge should let the entire video be public.

Looks like the judge is trying to avoid a media crucifiction of the shooting officer. No matter what the situation was, the officer is not going to be able to sue the college kid. If the officer had reason to shoot, we'd have seen the video long ago. But the kid's family could sue the officer and his police department for millions if he was killed without due cause. Looks like the county better start counting out the money.

I'm sure its only a matter of time before the cops are being sued by the family. Cops always have to defend themselves ..regardless of the situation. They are guilty until proven innocent.

How can documented facts BIAS a jury? I thought only a judge could do that.

Looks like they are going to file charges, or at least put it before a grand jury. I was one of the outspoken pro-LEO who decided not to pass judgement quickly (like others on here unfortunately). give it time and the facts will come out. Does not look good for the officers and probably will go before a grand jury. Have to agree that if it was a cut and dry clean shoot, the tape, or at least some pics from it would have been released. They can't release it now b/c it could taint a potential jury.

View Comments VIEW ALL 17 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here