Raleigh, N.C. — An email sent by UNC System President Erskine Bowles chided university chancellors for growing administrative costs and told them to target such costs while cutting budgets.
"We have discussed the need to pare administrative costs REPEATEDLY at Chancellors' meetings," wrote Bowles, adding capital letters for emphasis.
"And we have made it crystal clear that any further delay in reducing senior and middle management positions would jeopardize our credibility and standing with the General Assembly and the taxpayers of North Carolina," he continued.
All UNC campuses are cutting their budgets by 10 percent. The new state budget decreases funding by 6 percent, and schools must cut another 4 percent in case of more revenue shortfalls.
Administrative costs became an issue after a 100-page report found that UNC-Chapel Hill's administrative expenses per student have grown faster than academic expenses. The report said that UNC-CH has 10 layers of management, in which more than half of supervisors oversee three or fewer people. Changing that structure could save the university up to $12 million annually.
Other campuses in the UNC system are studying the report.
Bowles cited coverage of the report by The News & Observer as "an absolute embarrassment." Chancellors must heed the calls for greater efficiency that he has repeated in his nearly four-year tenure as UNC system president, Bowles said.
Administrative costs should be cut and academics strengthened as chancellors determine where to reduce funding, he wrote.
"Hear me loud and clear," Bowles wrote, "we will be looking for absolute PROOF that you have focused FIRST on administrative reductions and solid evidence that you have taken steps to shore up your core academic services."
Without that proof, the Board of Governors will not approve universities' spending cuts, he wrote.
Bowles said he plans to meet Monday with all chancellors to discuss budget cuts.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/02/10707648/bbpics_miyon53519-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/travel/2012/02/09/10710709/10710709-1328829176-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wralsportsfan.com/asset/basketball/2012/02/09/10705803/10705803-1328766083-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/travel/2012/02/08/10704761/10704761-1328743348-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
August 31, 2009 6:57 p.m.
When they hire a high wage position the entire HR process should be centralized instead of at each university in the system.
This would prevent the under the table, back room meetings and 'confidential' emails to do the deals.
August 31, 2009 5:50 p.m.
August 31, 2009 4:23 p.m.
You might be onto something significant.
mgratk, I agree with your assessment as well.
August 31, 2009 2:59 p.m.
Once again, the bloated administration study was done on UNC-CH. UNC-CH receives grossly more funding that any other institution in the system. None of the other universities have the funds to have the bloated administration like UNC-CH does.
However, when they have been pointed out as being the "bad guy", Erskine and the UNC-CH folks have tried to pull everyone else in with them as having done the same thing.
UNC-CH is the culprit!
August 31, 2009 2:08 p.m.