Death penalty foes to march to N.C. coast

Raleigh, N.C. — The Sojourners for Abolition and Reconciliation started their annual march Sunday to protest the death penalty.

“I don't think that it's the state's place to take life,” death penalty opponent Mary Rider said.

Last year, the Christian-based group walked 300 miles from Raleigh to Washington, DC. This year, they are walking from Raleigh to the North Carolina coast and back.

“That will bring a kind of a ripple effect where people will hear our message who might not have heard it otherwise,” Rider said.

“We're not trying to impose our view on anybody, but we really do want to talk to people,” said Scott Bass, SOFAR walk organizer.

Wayne Uber, a Chapel Hill resident, has personal reasons for backing the death penalty. His twin brother, Jeffrey, was slain in Florida over some credit cards, and the killer received a life sentence.

“There are people out there who have strong feelings about this, but they haven't been here. They haven't seen what other victims go through. They just aren't qualified to comment on it,” Uber said.

The state is under a moratorium on executions because of problems with lethal injection as the execution method.

“The death penalty is not the solution that helps anybody, but only adds more violence to situations that are oftentimes senselessly violent and tragic already,” Bass said.

There are 167 inmates on death row in North Carolina, according to Death Penalty Information Center.

The SOFAR marchers will be back in Raleigh in about two weeks to rally in front of the General Assembly.

69 Comments

WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

VIEW ALL 69 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments

O well, you cannot stop the lemmings from marching to the sea either.

SANDHILL
June 15, 2009 7:18 p.m.

GetRight, eyewitnesses are quite often wrong. In fact, in today's legal process they're actually considered one of the least reliable sources of testimony. Check out the Innocence Project (www.innocenceproject.org) and you'll see tons of cases where DNA evidence overturned flawed eyewitness testimony. If you want a real, airtight conviction, stick with the physical evidence.

braddyg
June 15, 2009 6:09 p.m.

"You are attacking the validity of a "study" in and of itself. There are multiple studies across multiple states over the past few decades that bear out this point: It Cost More to Execute, period."

You forgot to say "based on the studies I've cited, which were funded by groups who oppose the death penalty. I did a Google search too, and found just as many studies from pro-death penalty groups citing the costs to be lower for those who are sent to Death Row. The point is, you can claim it's fact all you want...but it doesn't make it so. Neither do one-sided studies, which is why I didn't post studies refuting your claims in the first place.

braddyg
June 15, 2009 6:04 p.m.

Ok Mako II:

How about situations where there where there were eyewitnesses?