Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

2:58 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

City employees not happy with Raleigh's budget proposal


e-mail print friendly
budget
budget

The Raleigh City Council heard concerns from police officers, firefighters and other city workers over the fiscal 2009-10 budget at a public hearing Tuesday evening.

City Manager Russell Allen has proposed a $696.2 million budget that would cut 85 vacant positions to eliminate a projected $20 million shortfall.

The budget proposal caps the annual merit raise at 4 percent for employees that have been on the job for five years or less. Employees with six years of service or more, would be eligible for a smaller merit raise, or no raise at all. The proposal also raises health insurance premiums for city employees.

"What message do you send police officers when you ask them to work harder, but fail to reward them for their dedication and commitment to our city?" said Rick Armstrong, president of the Raleigh Police Protective Association.

"(City workers) will not receive any merit adjustment (or) cost-of-living raise, and their insurance is going to go up. So, their check will be less next year than it is this year," Armstrong said. "I think there's a lot of frustration there."

The public workers said they are upset about the cuts, given that Allen recently received a 4.75 percent raise.

"We feel like there is money in the budget that can be found and appropriated for a very modest raise," said Keith Wilder, president of the Raleigh Professional Firefighters Association.

The Parks and Recreation Department would take the biggest hit in Allen’s proposal, losing 27 open positions. The city would also cut operating hours and maintenance at community centers, public pools, parks and greenways.

The budget proposal also cuts positions in the Inspections and Public Works departments.

"People can't afford this new budget. It is ridiculous," sanitation worker Eddie Edgerton said.

Allen said the cuts, along with savings in travel and training, holding off on replacing older vehicles and capping pay raises for city workers at 4 percent, would save Raleigh about $15.1 million in operating costs and $10 million in capital spending.

During a down economy, Mayor Charles Meeker said Raleigh employees are lucky things aren't worse.

"Raleigh is fortunate we are talking about some increases as opposed to laying people off,” Meeker said.

The proposed $384.5 million operating budget would be 0.7 percent less than the 2008-09 operating budget.

RELATED TOPICS: Charles Meeker, Raleigh

e-mail print friendly

146 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 146 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
I don't agree that Allen should get a hefty raise when most employees are getting little to nothing.....However, I find the RPD and RFD employees a tad ungrateful....they don't seem to realize that ALL Wake employees, including WCSO, will also get NO raise this year.....and haven't gotten a COL in many years....that's why RPD salaries are higher after 5 or so years in.....

BUT, we all have to make some kind of sacrifice. If getting no raise in a recession meant I'd keep my job, I'm not sure I'd be complaining. Now, when the economy is better, if this is how they are treated, I'd agree with them. But not right now.

oh, and definitely have Mr.Allen out at the crack of dawn picking up trash-or if it isn't picked up it becomes HIS problem!

This is a case of adding insult to injury-first, a budget cut for most, then a pay raise for Mr. Allen! Let's have him ride "shotgun" with the firefighters and police for a while and see how valuable he thinks their 56 hours per week might be! Once again, elite snobbery at its shabbiest!

The household income model doesn't exactly match government income model.

There is a huge difference between the "personal" and the "societal"

Some service you can't turn off. Are you going to not pay for orphans? Not police? Fire nursing staff and turn away people to clinics (hence not treating communicable diseases?) Either you keep the roads fixed or you close roads. There's a huge laundry list of such activities showing the difference.

That being the case, there are things you can do.

The first is hire a private outside firm to AUDIT you. Let them determine if you aren't opening your IT services to competitive bids (most state services cost $150 whereas homeowners get the SAME service for less than $45)

Seek redundancy, unnecessary and least used services.

"The Bobs" will help determine what personnel aren't needed, or whether some personnel can be cut or others must get raised salaries.

But ask a politician to lose control from an Audit? THAT is the problem!

raleighboyfd Thank you for explaining why the city employees are so upset about the cuts. People are missing the point. We understand as city employees that there is a short fall and cuts must be made. But that means cuts for everyone, not certain people. My check will get smaller. Allens will get much bigger. Not right at all. Lead by example Mr. Allen and Mr. Meeker.

View Comments VIEW ALL 146 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here