Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

6:07 p.m. • 2-9-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Fri: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Tobacco farmers fret over recession, proposed taxes


e-mail print friendly
tobacco
tobacco

As tobacco farmers prepare their fields for this year's crop, they already worry about the one-two punch of a down economy and calls for higher cigarette taxes.

A federal cigarette tax of 62 cents per pack that went into effect this month triggered an increase in prices, and manufacturers are buying less tobacco in anticipation that sales will slump.

"We got an immediate 15 percent cut in what we could grow this year on contract," Nash County farmer Greg Bunn said. "It's a 15 percent pay cut really, because I would say 90 percent of my income is dependent on tobacco."

Farmers throughout Nash County are in the same position. Many already paid for supplies and even planted some greenhouse seeds based on higher expected yields.

Charlie Tyson, Nash County's extension director, said a handful of local tobacco farmers have decided not to grow a crop this year, and he fears the situation could get worse for those who plant tobacco.

Gov. Beverly Perdue's proposed budget includes a $1-per-pack increase in the state cigarette tax, and a bill to ban smoking in restaurants is working its way through the General Assembly.

"These farm families, they shoulder the burden of this tax revenue," Tyson said. "It's been an anti-stimulus effect."

Supporters of the cigarette tax increase say it could make a dent in the state's projected $3 billion budget deficit for the 2009-10 fiscal year. Bunn and other farmers say it would make their family budgets worse, however.

"We're willing to do our share, but we just feel like it's unfair to put it all on tobacco," Bunn said. "After a while, when do you kill the golden goose?"

RELATED TOPICS: Nash County, Recession, Beverly Perdue

e-mail print friendly

22 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 22 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Are you serious, rc4nc? 88% of what a slave did benefited him?! You're just trolling, right? We're just going to have to disagree on that one. (wow)

So, to other folks who actually agree that slavery was bad, bad & bad... my point is that just because something is currently "legal", does not mean it's "right". Growing & manufacturing an addictive product that kills people, is one of those things...legal, but unethical.

Slavery? Since you've compared the legal tobacco industry with the pre 1865 legality of slavery. The comment that "people used to make tons of $$ from that too...until it was outlawed", uses the same flawed logic. Respected economist have published studies that show that only 12% of the slaves expropriated labor was "taken" from him/her. 88% percent of what a slave produced directly benefited him/her. Using those numbers, Slaves were far better off than anyone who currently lives, works and pays taxes.

Oops... I meant to say "Just because something is LEGAL, does not mean that it's right." lol

This country was created with slave labor...should we continue that merely because it was tradition? And, people used to make tons of $$ from that too...until it was outlawed.

Just because something is illegal, does not mean that it's "right". Tobacco addicts people and kills them...including 3000 new young people every day. I'm surprised tobacco people can sleep at night. They are no better than the illegal drug suppliers whose products are not even as addictive or deadly.

Well, way back when Chief Justice John Marshall made the comment that the "Power to tax is the power to destroy", that has been the ultimate goal of taxes on tobacco. I'm just curious who's going to pay for all these nice programs you currently fund with the exorbitant taxes collected on tobacco, once you've succeeded in killing what's left of the tobacco industry?

View Comments VIEW ALL 22 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here