Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

1:09 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Teachers push repeal of school-calendar law


e-mail print friendly
Education
Education

Five years after the General Assembly passed a law prohibiting school districts from starting class before Aug. 25, some teachers want to give some scheduling flexibility back to schools.

Rep. Paul Luebke, D-Durham, sponsored House Bill 593 at the request of several local teachers. They say starting school earlier would help improve student test scores.

"We're concerned about the school calendar law, especially dealing with exams," said Rita Rathbone, a teacher at Riverside High School in Durham. "It means that we don't get to give exams until after Christmas break."

Rathbone and her fellow teachers said the two-week break hurts student performance on exams because they start to forget some of the material they covered in class.

Starting school on the second Monday in August also could solve the problem of having to schedule snow makeup days during spring break, which happened this year.

Louise Lee formed the group Save Our Summers to lobby for the 2004 school-calendar law, and she said repealing it would be a bad idea.

"It's so much more than, 'We want a long vacation,'" Lee said. "Low-income families, for example, had students that had to have those jobs during the summer to help pay for college (or) to put food on tables."

The state tourism industry, which backed the school-calendar law in an effort to encourage family vacations in August, fears the new proposals will shorten the summer vacation season.

"We'll fight to keep their voices heard here," said Connie Wilson, a lobbyist for the tourism industry. "We believe it's important for families, for the economy and definitely important for our kids."

The proposed bill, which is in the House Education Committee, wouldn't affect year-round schools. A similar bill in the Senate would give power back to all school systems to set their own calendars.

"No one wants to take summer away," Rathbone said. "We're simply asking for the flexibility to start school a few days earlier – two weeks at most."

RELATED TOPICS: Durham

e-mail print friendly

80 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 80 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Hmmmmm I've been teaching in NC since 98 and I've never heard of such a rule as punch in 2.5 hours and get paid 8. We have always been required to work 8-4, with a one hour lunch break or work 8-3 with no break. I take advantage of EVERY workday if I can! There is always, always, always work to do that can't get done while students are there!

Can someone please find the rule for me that teachers only have to stay 2.5 hours on a workday? Because I want to show it to my principal and prove that I don't have to stay there until 4 like every other school employee.

According to the rules where I work, a workday is the same length or longer as a regular student day. And you can believe that most of the teachers I work with use every minute of it wisely.

"It's so much more than, 'We want a long vacation,'" That's exactly what was said. Special interest groups such as tourism have no business regulating education. Long summer vacations = stupid kids.

"lets look at the issue that way, not based on irrational feelings, memories, or fears." - Ok, I'm dropping all my irrational feelings, memories, and fears. Let's see, looking at that way, hmmmmm....NOPE, still not a good idea. Starting school a half month earlier doesn't appeal to most peoples rational thinking, and so the bill will be defeated. However, it is good to know that someone on here knows how irrational everyone else is.

"I feel I can add my two cents worth since I went to school under both systems. When I was in Middle school we were under the old system of starting school after Labor Day, and ending in June. We took exams after our two week break. I hated it, I didn't feel I could enjoy my vacation because of the up coming exams. When we returned to classes it all all review for two weeks, while we all adjusted back to the "school mode". When I was in High School they changed the school year so exams would be taken before school and "low" income families could save money on electric bills because the students would be in the air conditioned schools during the hottest month of the year. It was great, exams were completed before Christmas and we were out for the summer before Memorial Day."

I agree. I did it under both systems as well. First semester exams should be over before winter break. It does no one a favor to take exams two weeks after a two-week break. That makes no logical sense.

View Comments VIEW ALL 80 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here