Local News

Attorney general says Mike Peterson shouldn't get new trial

Posted February 27, 2009

Map Marker  Find News Near Me

— In court documents filed Friday, the North Carolina Attorney General's Office says convicted killer Mike Peterson should not get another day in court, despite a judge's decision last year to hold a hearing on whether prosecutors withheld evidence in his murder trial.

Peterson, 65, is serving a life sentence for the Dec. 9, 2001, death of his wife, Kathleen Peterson. She was found dead in a pool of blood at the bottom of a staircase in the couple's home.

He has maintained she died in an accidental fall.

State prosecutors stepped in after Richmond, Va., attorney Jason Anthony filed a motion on Peterson's behalf in November alleging prosecutors withheld evidence about a tire iron found in the area, impairing defense attorneys’ efforts to argue that an intruder had killed Kathleen Peterson.

Investigators never found a murder weapon, and prosecutors argued during trial that Peterson killed his wife with an instrument similar to a fireplace blow poke.

"The tire iron is irrelevant," Attorney General Roy Cooper's office said in response to Anthony's motion. "No substantial evidence suggests that it could have been the murder weapon."

Peterson's defense could have presented the “unknown intruder” defense without the tire iron, the state said.

Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson, who presided over the trial in 2003, agreed to hear evidence from Anthony, but has not set a court date.

Hudson said Friday afternoon he was aware of the attorney general's response to the motion but had not had a chance to review it.

Anthony said Friday that he maintains evidence was intentionally withheld.

"I would find it very difficult to believe that any written document could change the fact that this item (tire iron) was tested by the prosecutor while the blow poke was not," Anthony said Friday.

The attorney general denies prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence and charges that Peterson wants to try another theory because his first one did not work.

"The charge is no more than wishful thinking, wishful thinking influenced by the jury's seeing thorough the accident defense," according to Friday's filing. "The claim now that an unknown intruder was a better defense or a supplementary one to accident is self-serving and pretentious."

The document goes on to say that Peterson's attorneys are trying to play on emotions in the wake of the Duke lacrosse case in which former District Attorney Mike Nifong sought to prosecute three athletes on false charges of rape, kidnapping and sexual assault.

Nifong resigned from office and was dismissed for the way he handled the case, which partly included withholding evidence that would have benefited the defendants.

The state says Anthony "hopes to prevail in this cause through rhetoric (rather) than through facts" by associating Nifong with the Peterson case.

"He (Nifong) was not part of prosecution in this case." The response says. "He had no involvement in the case except occasionally to participate in a group discussion about some particular matter associated with the case."

Peterson has exhausted all appeals in his case. In November 2007, the North Carolina Supreme Court rejected his request for a new trial.

Other attorneys, including Anthony, have since introduced new arguments in calls to reopen the case.

In August, former Durham District Attorney David Saacks turned down a request in which local attorney Larry Pollard cited a microscopic feather found on Kathleen Peterson that supports a long-standing theory that an owl could have attacked her.

Supporting his theory of an intruder, Anthony has said that a man living a few block from the Petersons' Cedar Street mansion found a tire iron in his yard and that authorities failed to share the information with Peterson's attorneys.

Saacks has said the tire iron wasn't connected to the case and that rules of discovery in effect at the time of the trial didn't require prosecutors to turn over the information to the defense.

Defense attorneys learned of the tire iron last year when Saacks gave them access to the state's files in the case.

33 Comments

This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • Tax Man Feb 27, 2009

    Used to be in NC the prosecution was permitted to deny the defense information about any evidence the prosecution was not going to use, even if it would prove the defendant was innocent. Now the law is the prosecution MUST give all the information to the defense. Here they kept the information from the defense and it was only discovered later by a new defense lawyer and investigators for the defense. A new trial is in order because the prosecution did not play by the rules and the law! The only way to rectify that is to allow Peterson to have full access to all of the evidence at a new proceeding. The DA played fast and loose with this case and it is their fault - but the defense is entitled to be treated fairly.

  • Tax Man Feb 27, 2009

    The prosecution has shown it has little regard for the law or ethics. The court should allow this appeal and give the defense the opportunity to bring this matter to a new jury, new judge and a new prosecutor. The house of Durham is in shambles and has been throughout this matter. I just do not trust them at all. Let this man's attorneys try to convince a jury that he did not do it, and make the prosecution prove that he did it. C'mon Judge Hudson, be fair and impartial here.

  • renaizzanceman Feb 27, 2009

    My thoughts exactly about Mike, Scott and Drew. Hello? Doesn't anybody see the similarity? In the Peterson household, the mantra apparently is "The family that stays together, slays together."
    All of them should get the needle for what they've done.

  • awomnsptofview Feb 27, 2009

    Mike, Scott, and Drew. Peterson is not a man I would let my daughter date.

  • Drakula_I_G Feb 27, 2009

    Good grief, he's GUILTY.
    Didn't anyone actually FOLLOW this case in the media?
    He is 100% no-questions-asked guilty.

  • ghimmy51 Feb 27, 2009

    Know what folks? I don't like the guy's looks. I don't like his taste in photography and I don't like his choice of escorts. Having said that I see nothing wrong with listening.

  • tiblet Feb 27, 2009

    MP is as guilty as homemade sin....if he walks on a technicality it will be tragic...and mark my words...someone else will end up at the bottom of the staircase.

  • copforlife Feb 27, 2009

    OH GREAT....NOW THERE'S A HOMICIDAL OWL RUNNING AMUCK!!!!!!

  • judithfergerson Feb 27, 2009

    There are very few good guys in State Government but Roy Cooper is one of the best. He stands for what is right no matter what.

  • whocares Feb 27, 2009

    Although Mike Nifong used the Peterson case to get his name out there for election, he had absolutely NOTHING to do with this case. As far as the DA goes Jim Harden was the prosecutor and he did not hide evidence. As I have already said to one of my co-workers, I guess the owl swooped down and hit her on the head, dropped a microscopic feather, flew out of the house without Peterson seeing it, and dropped the tire iron in his neighbor's yard. Give me a break, he is where he should be and if people had to vote on whether or not to give him a new trial, he would LOOSE. No one wants their tax dollars wasted for some far-fetched tale.

More...