Local News

Loopholes allow contaminated food to go unchecked

Posted February 5, 2009

— Lawmakers reacted angrily Thursday when told that food makers and state safety inspectors are allowed to keep tests results secret.

That keeps federal health officials in the dark even when products have been contaminated by salmonella or other dangerous bacteria.

"I'd like to see some people go to jail," Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said during a Senate Agriculture Committee hearing on a deadly salmonella outbreak linked to a Georgia peanut plant that has sickened more than 550 people and killed at least eight.

Federal law does not require reporting of contaminants if companies receive private test results showing them or states find them in their inspections, said Dr. Stephen Sundlof, food safety director for the Food and Drug Administration.

"That's one of the very serious loopholes we need to plug," said Sen. Saxby Chambliss, a Georgia Republican and the committee's ranking minority member.

Sundlof defended the FDA's handling of the current outbreak, but also noted gaps in the country's food safety system that hamper the agency's efforts. The FDA learned only weeks ago that the Peanut Corp. of America had received a series of private tests dating back to 2007 showing salmonella in their products from the Georgia plant, but later shipped the items after obtaining negative test results.

"We would like to have as much information as possible" from food makers, Sundlof said.

Leahy said food manufacturers should face possible jail time and other tough penalties to beef up compliance with federal food safety rules. "Fines won't do it," he said.

Sundlof pointed out that a federal criminal investigation of the outbreak is under way.

Also Thursday, the Department of Agriculture suspended Peanut Corp. from participating in government contract programs for at least a year. Secretary Tom Vilsack also removed Stewart Parnell, president of the company, from USDA's Peanut Standards Board.

"The actions of (Peanut Corp. of America) indicate that the company lacks business integrity and business honesty, which seriously and directly hinders its ability to do business with the federal government," said David Shipman, Acting Administrator of USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service.

Peanut Corp. has denied any wrongdoing in the outbreak and has said its Blakely plant had received regular visits and inspections from state and federal authorities in 2008 and had gotten a "superior" rating from an independent inspection.

Sundlof told senators the FDA was hot on the trail of a Georgia processor even before they were certain that peanuts were to blame for hundreds of illnesses.

The first signs of the outbreak were detected in November by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But disease detectives initially suspected chicken was the culprit in clusters of salmonella infections that states were reporting.

On Jan. 7 and 8, after discussions between federal and Minnesota authorities, peanut butter was added to the short list of suspects when some people who had gotten sick reported eating peanut butter in nursing homes and at an elementary school. On Jan. 8, the FDA visited an Ohio distributor for Peanut Corp. of America.

The next day federal inspectors were at the company's Blakely, Ga. facility, which ultimately was identified as the source of the food poisoning. That same day, Jan. 9, Minnesota health officials found salmonella in an open container of peanut butter made at the plant. On Jan. 10, Minnesota made a positive match to the salmonella strain that caused the outbreak.

Sundlof said the FDA has made many improvements in its food-safety system, and acted quickly in the current outbreak.

"The American food supply continues to be among the safest in the world," Sundlof said.

Lawmakers, however, may not be reassured. They are concerned about the state of the national food safety system, a collaboration between the FDA, CDC and authorities in each state. As the list of recalled items containing peanut products surpasses 1,000, lawmakers are vowing to press for stronger food safety laws and more money for inspections.

"To say that food safety in this country is a patchwork system is giving it too much credit. Food safety in America has become a hit or miss gamble, and that is truly frightening," said Agriculture Committee Chairman Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa. "It's time to find the gaps in the system and remedy them."

Waving a peanut butter sandwich at one point and a jar of peanut butter later, Harkin said he was "nothing short of outraged" at the increasing number of food-poisoning outbreaks. He said consumers should be able to rely on the safety of food staples like peanut butter found in nearly every home.

"If that's not safe, we have to ask what is," Harkin said, adding he would eat his peanut butter sandwich to show major brands found in grocery stores are not affected by the current outbreak or recall.

Harkin asked how a Texas plant owned by Peanut Corp. could have operated unlicensed and uninspected for nearly four years. The Associated Press reported this week that the company did not register with Texas health officials after it opened in March 2005 and state officials inspected it only after discovering it during the current outbreak.

"Should I be alarmed about that?" Harkin asked Sundlof. "I mean, how many plants are operating like this?

Sundlof, who didn't answer Harkin's question directly, said states have different licensing and inspection requirements.

More illnesses could be linked to the salmonella-contaminated peanut products over the next two to three weeks, although the outbreak is slowing, Assistant Surgeon General Ali Khan said.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • SaveEnergyMan Feb 5, 2009

    Meat processors have an FDA person on-site at all times and large facilties have several to many who keep close tabs on what's going on. Smaller facilities aren't given as much scrutiny. 99% of the facilities maintain clean conditions and would rather scrap a day or a week's worth of product if there was a hint of contamination or harm. However, you have some folks who see the bottom line as more important and people die as a result. I hope these executives are charged with manslaughter as a result. The only way to insure safety is to make them personally liable.

  • terrible terrier Feb 5, 2009

    I worked for years for a Peanut Butter manufacturer with responsibility for safety and quality. We worked hard to produce a safe product. One time we had a single positive test for Salmonella...and multiple additional tests all came back negative. We believed that the "positive" was probably an error ("false positive" is the actual term used). Despite that we scrapped two days production of product simply because the risk wasn't worth the cost of lost production.

    These clowns in Georgia really make me mad...not just for their greed and stupidity...but because all the people who do work hard to protect food safety get tarred with the same brush.

  • shine Feb 5, 2009

    There should be FDA people on sight just like there are in any processing and foods plant. Inspectors work there everyday just like employees. No different than ATF agents working in a cigarette manufacturing plant.

  • seankelly15 Feb 5, 2009

    Let's adopt the Chinese strategy... When the people responsible for the deaths of untold numbers of babies in China because of the company's decision to put melamine into baby formula were convicted, they were sentenced to death. If US manufacturers believe that they are entitled to put people's lives at risk to improve the company', bottom line then congress will need to step in and provide SERIOUS sanctions for this greed. There is no acceptible margin of risk.

  • Slip Kid Feb 5, 2009

    There was a peanut outbreak?

  • colliedave Feb 5, 2009

    Nothing can be made totally safe. The more levels of inspections one adds, the greater the cost increase of the goods. At some point the ROI becomes negligiable. But the real goal is to prove the government really, really, really cares as intent is more important than results.

  • TheLiberalIntellect Feb 5, 2009

    It's sad that outbreaks seem to happen so often these days. From spinach, to tomatoes to peanuts. Even our food isn't safe!

  • workingforthosethatwont Feb 5, 2009

    Based on their tax paying history, selling their seat to a potential successor, romps with prostitutes...and the list goes on....this ought to be good.