Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

4:44 p.m. • 5-19-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Mon: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 76° F
  • Tue: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 81° F
  • Wed: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 86° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2009-01-08 13:40:00
Updated: 2009-03-09 17:12:06

Repaving I-795 could cost up to $22M


Interstate 795
DOT Looking Into Cracked Pavement on I-795
print friendly

Possible structural deficiencies on the 18 miles of Interstate 795 could cost the state Department of Transportation anywhere from $14 million to $22 million to repair, the agency said Thursday.

A new report from the Federal Highway Administration recommends removing the existing surface layers and adding 2.5 to 3 inches of pavement on the road, which runs from Wilson to Goldsboro.



Cracks surfaced along a 2.5-mile stretch of the $120 million highway within months after it opened in 2005. Despite extensive tests, neither the DOT nor the contractor could determine what was causing the crumbling.

The FHWA's report partly blames air pockets in two hot-mix asphalt layers for the problems, but it suggests overweight trucks on the road also could be to blame.

Repairs are already under way to fix large potholes and cracks. That is costing the state more than $483,000, the DOT said.

DOT chief engineer Jon Nance said the agency would likely pay a majority of the cost because the problems were not discovered until after a 12-month warranty had expired. He said the federal government and contractor, S. T. Wooten, might cover a portion of it.

"We're going to look at some of the root causes and find out what happened, when it occurred and why it occurred," Nance said. "I don't think, today, we're in a position to say what the contractor will or won't do."

The federal report notes that the pavement was designed according to DOT procedures and that it was appropriate for the assumed traffic.

"We fully performed the project, and believe any problems are not attributable, in any way, to S.T. Wooten's performance of the work," the company's Ricky Vick said.

The DOT said that a February 2008 study found that overall traffic was about half of that assumed for the design, but that truck traffic was significantly higher than what was expected and that a significant portion of those trucks were 10 percent overweight.

This is not the first time the DOT has had problems with crumbling pavement along a major roadway.

In 2007, it spent about $22 million to repave a 10.6-mile stretch of Interstate 40 in Durham after finding that expansion joints were improperly constructed when new concrete was laid on top of the old during a widening project.


View Larger Map


59 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 59 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
anything thats built is only as good as its foundation. if a pavement fails, the base wasnt prepared well enough for its conditions, whether it be a design flaw or a corner cut in materials.

Is there anyone compaining that would hire a contractor to perform work on your home solely on the basis of lowest bidder?

There's something wrong with this facet of state law. The state needs to be able to contract with individuals and firms with a proven service record. Time and time again contractors who bid low do so because they plan, from the get go, the cut corners so as to make a satisfactory profit despite their low bid. And then you're forced to pay them AGAIN to fix their shoddy work.

It's cliche, but the old addage "You get what you pay for" sometimes really does fit in NC - contractor relationships.

murph: I ALSO AGREE WITH YOUR POST ABOUT THE LENGTH OF A PROPER WARRANTY FOR ROADWAY & BRIDEGS WORK FOR NCDOT SHOULD BE FOR AT LEAST A PERIOD OF 7-10 YEARS

A 1 year warranty on something that should last a couple of decades or crazy. The idiot that signed that contract should be fired.

To get it fixed you make the contractor fix it, warranty or not. If they refuse, they get no more government contracts from the state. Pretty simple...

annree69 That is the way that is an was spposed to work but in reality all it takes on the part of a contractor is a phone to the inspectors supervisor an if he is trying to do his job an actually enforce the ncdot speceficiations as they ar suppose to be enforced he is removed an sent home / constructively dischargeed or in other words his work duty's are deminished an he isn't allowed to do his job period so dont blame the good inspectors that are in most part concenious an looking to do a good job for the ncdot but they arent being allowed to do so . been there done that terminated an retailation for trying to do the job

View Comments VIEW ALL 59 COMMENTS