Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

1:48 p.m. • 2-12-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Clear.
    • Hi: 41° F
  • Mon: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Tue: Rain.
    • Hi: 53° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

UNC panel examines possible hate crimes policy


e-mail print friendly
graffiti
graffiti

A University of North Carolina panel struggled Wednesday with free-speech protections as members considered whether the 16-campus university system needs a policy to address hate crimes.

UNC President Erskine Bowles appointed the UNC Study Commission to Review Student Codes of Conduct as They Relate to Hate Crimes, which includes students, staff and faculty from 10 UNC campuses, after four North Carolina State University students spray-painted racist graffiti on campus last month.

The students painted the graffiti on the walls of the school's "Free Expression Tunnel" the night that Barack Obama was elected president. Two of the messages said: "Let's shoot that (N-word) in the head" and "Hang Obama by a noose."

Officials with the state chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People called for the students to be expelled, but officials said they had no grounds to do that.

"This is an important conversation for us to have, (but) it is unfortunate that we have to do so as a result of the situation at N.C. State," said Harold Martin, UNC senior vice president for academic affairs, who chairs the commission.

The panel heard from Hugh Stevens, a Raleigh attorney who specializes in First Amendment cases.

"I concurred with all of the authorities who concluded that (the students) were also protected by the First Amendment," said Stevens, who added that he found the graffiti embarrassing.

Laura Luger, UNC vice president and general counsel, said any policy can't be targeted toward a group or idea.

"It is over historical events and incidents (involving) offensive, unpopular, controversial speech that the First Amendment has protected," Luger said.

The group also reviewed hate crime policies in California, Texas and Minnesota that Martin said define what is considered a hate crime.

A public forum has been scheduled for Jan. 15 – the location hasn't been set – so commission members can hear from students and others.

Bowles has set a March 31 deadline for the group's recommendations on a policy and on whether all UNC students should be required to take diversity training.

RELATED TOPICS: Barack Obama, Raleigh, NAACP, NC State University

e-mail print friendly

86 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 86 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Hate crimes laws = "thought police" = Communism!

If punishment is based on the color of one's skin, then the justice system and those who are for it are just as racist as the person doing the crime.

What the overly sensitive and politically correct don't seem to understand is that they want to water down free speech and indoctrinate a "thought police."

Even 20 years ago - this kind of thinking would have been considered abnormal and you would have been laughed into seclusion. Now that the socialist politically correct overly sensitive have become what they believe is main stream, now we are discussing taking away the first amendment because someone was offended.

No where in the constitution or in the bible does it say that you have a right or a blessing to not be offended. It is neither. It is a fact of life.

Whenever we can purge these overly sensitive and politically correct people from the political and educational process, then we might have a discussion - but until then, we will never have a meaningful discussion about racial slurs or racially based crimes.

"MLK told us to judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. Have we forgotten this?"

The NAACP seems to have never understood this concept. What is the difference between the comments of the students and all the trash talk I read and hear against Bush?

You are basing the punishment for a crime on the color of the victim's skin. How is this equal justice?

View Comments VIEW ALL 86 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here