Raleigh, N.C. — Raleigh city planners rolled out ideas Monday about how to direct the city's growth over the next two decades.
The proposals are the first updates to Raleigh's Comprehensive Plan since 1989.
Raleigh's population was about 380,000 people in July – an 84 percent increase from the 207,000 people recorded by the 1990 census – and it is now one of the 50 most-populous cities nationwide. The city's population is expected to grow to 600,000 by 2030, based on national population trends.
Under current zoning, planners say, such growth would spur a "centerless and undifferentiated pattern of sprawling development." Sprawl is taxing the city's green space, roads and sewer capacity and will only become worse if changes aren't made to the city's growth plan, they said.
"Taxes tend to go up because you have to maintain this vast network of highways and infrastructure, and people are finding out that the congestion isn't worth it, the taxes aren't worth it," Raleigh Planning Director Mitchell Silver said.
The Comprehensive Plan calls for funneling 60 percent of future growth – about 72,000 homes, townhouses and apartments – into eight growth centers that are in locations with combined highway and targeted transit access.
"People can go to one location. They can live, they can work, they can shop (and) they can find things to do if they want recreation," Silver said.
The centers include downtown Raleigh, Brier Creek, the Midtown area near North Hills, Crabtree Valley, west Raleigh, the area around Cameron Village and North Carolina State University, the area near Triangle Town Center mall and New Bern Avenue around WakeMed.
This year, more than 1,000 people – a record number – have moved to downtown, increasing the population there to 6,000, city officials estimate. Development in downtown is expected to stay flat next year, but pick up in 2010, officials said.
Along with the growth centers, planners say, new homes should be built smaller, and the city should become considerably more transit friendly, with street cars, express buses and commuter rail.
"The car is not going away, but I think people are looking for choices to walk, to bike and to take transit, both rail and bus," Silver said.
Some people have criticized the plan, saying it doesn't guarantee that money will be spent on commuter rails and bus lines necessary to make public transit work in Raleigh.
The comprehensive plan also targets 18 areas for economic growth and revitalization, such as Glenwood Avenue from Pleasant Valley to Ebenezer Church Road and Capital Boulevard from downtown to the Interstate 440 Beltline.
"We want to find out if some of the shopping centers, when they age out, can redevelop with housing," Silver said.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717043/10717043-1328939633-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
This will make the traffic problem worse because people will be driving farther in their cars so they can live in a house with a yard instead of the Socialist Utopia that Raleigh will become with everybody living in a Condo downtown.
This has already happened in Wake County when Cary stopped development. Development moved down NC-55 to Apex, Holly Springs, and Fuquay-Varina. The state has had to widen NC-55 to accommodate this growth instead of handling it without the road construction if Cary had allowed development to continue.
December 2, 2008 12:54 p.m.
Charlotte's Light Rail was not really paid for by us local taxpayers. It was paid for by local large companies and we also have an extra sales tax just in Mecklenburg County for Restaurants, Hotels, Rental Cars...so ALOT of visitors are paying for our Light Rail.
I don't really have to worry about Light Rail...I live in Uptown Charlotte and work from home...but use Light Rail to go to restaurants and shopping and gallery crawls at SouthEnd. :)
December 2, 2008 11:30 a.m.
December 2, 2008 9:27 a.m.
There is NOT a viable public transit system in S FL. Tri-Rail and buses? That does not = a decent attempt at public transit. Metrorail in Miami? Let's not even go there.
S FL investing heavily in tranportation? Look at the Palmetto expressway - great investment. That road has been perpetually under contstruction for at least the last 30 years. By the time one lane is added, traffic volume has increased to the point that another two are needed. They are far too REACTIVE instead of PROACTIVE. Raleigh needs to be PROACTIVE, but we are already behind the power curve - the growth is here NOW.
For those who don't like the Comp Plan - don't complain, you had plenty of chances to contribute to it. Many public meetings and discussions were held.
December 2, 2008 8:35 a.m.
December 1, 2008 8:35 p.m.