Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

10:58 p.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sat: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Attorney: Evidence withheld in Peterson trial


e-mail print friendly
Mike Peterson
Mike Peterson

A Virginia attorney said he plans to file a motion Wednesday seeking a new trial for Durham novelist and convicted killer Mike Peterson.

Jason Anthony, who practices in Richmond, Va., said prosecutors withheld evidence during Peterson's 2003 murder trial, violating a judge's order in the case and the state's laws regarding evidentiary discovery in criminal trials.

Peterson was convicted of first-degree murder in the Dec. 9, 2001, death of his wife, Kathleen Peterson. She was found dead in a pool of blood at the bottom of a staircase in the couple’s Forest Hills mansion.

Kathleen Peterson died of blunt force trauma to the head, according to an autopsy report. Mike Peterson, 64, has maintained his wife died in an accidental fall.

Anthony said Peterson's former attorneys didn't know that a neighbor found a tire iron in his yard shortly after Kathleen Peterson's death and turned it over to police. Prosecutors tested the tire iron but never shared the information with the defense attorneys, he said.

Knowing about the tire iron would have changed the defense considerably – it might have been the murder weapon – and likely would have discredited some witnesses, Anthony said.

Durham County District Attorney David Saacks couldn't be reached Monday for comment. He has said in the past that investigators determined the tire iron was irrelevant to the Peterson case.

Saacks also has said discovery rules in effect in 2003 were different than those now on the books.

Mike Peterson is serving a life sentence at Nash Correctional Institution. Last November, the state Supreme Court upheld his conviction.

RELATED TOPICS: Durham County, Durham, Supreme Court, Richmond County

e-mail print friendly

63 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 63 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
to foghat4545......i'm glad you had the opportunity to have meet katherine and to have lunch with her....i'm sure she was a very sweet mother, wife and lady....i didnt know the petersons at all....i did indeed watch the trail on tv and i followed the case.....i was very surprised with the outcome.....my heart poured out to the girls, the daughters....the images of their faces etched in my mind and are there to this day.....i have a dear friend who did know the petersons....she babysitted for KP and she did tell me that KP was know for drinking and being unbalanced after she drank.....

i dont feel 100% that MP is guilty.....i just dont feel that way....

it saddens me when the law enforcement, the da and the media tries someone before the case is send to court.

thanks foghat4545 for your comments

raLIEgh

Very few of you understand the seriousness of this. If evidence was withheld in Mike Peterson's case, it could be withheld in any case, so you should hope you're never on trial in Durham, or anywhere else for that matter, particularly if you're innocent. Maybe I'm just not feeling as lighthearted as most of you, but I don't get all the joking around here -- a woman is dead, a family has been torn apart, and that's just too much devastation for me to think it's funny. I do appreciate those of you who see the serious side.

The thing about the tire iron is, it was processed but did it pertain to the case? And if not, the prosecution had no reason to use it.

The moral of the story is, if you are old, get a one story ranch.

In my opinion,that's how these DA's do business. They don't care if someone is innocent ( not saying Mike is)They are more concerned about getting another notch on their belts. Taken from someone who was found guity for a crime I didn't commit, I have zero faith in our justice system.

View Comments VIEW ALL 63 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here