Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

5:18 a.m. • 2-11-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 41° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Slain mom's husband could have to testify in custody case


e-mail print friendly
Nancy Cooper with family
Nancy Cooper with family

A slain Cary woman's husband would likely have to testify at a custody hearing if he wants to remain the legal guardian of his two children – currently in temporary care of their maternal grandparents, a family-law attorney says.

The parents and twin sister of Nancy Cooper, 34, were awarded emergency custody last Wednesday of her daughters, Bella 4, and Katie, who turns 2 this week.

In a petition for custody, they allege the children's father, Brad Cooper, is mentally unstable and poses a threat to the children. They claim he emotionally abused his wife and children, had threatened to kill himself last winter, withheld funds for their basic needs and had a sexual relationship with another woman.

Cooper did not consent to the emergency order, his attorney, Seth Blum said.

"He's a mess," Blum said of his client Monday. "His wife has been killed. His children are not in his custody."

Authorities have not named Cooper a suspect and have said he has been cooperative with the investigation. Blum said Friday his client has answered all questions and has told them he did not kill his wife.

But if Cooper were to testify, that could mean he could be cross-examined under oath about the murder case, Mark Sullivan, a Raleigh attorney who practices family law and is not involved in the case, said.

"Even then, if he goes into court, he may take the Fifth Amendment and insist on the privilege against self-incrimination if he's called to stand."

Another option, Sullivan said, would be for Cooper to wait for the criminal case to be resolved and then return to the custody issue.

Blum said Monday that Cooper will be at the hearing, scheduled for 9 a.m. Friday, but he did not know if his client would testify.

Nancy Cooper, 34, was reported missing July 12 when she failed to meet up with a friend as planned. Brad Cooper told police she had gone out for a jog that morning and never returned.

Two days later, a man walking his dog found her body, wearing little clothing, in an undeveloped subdivision outside Cary's town limit – less than three miles from the Coopers' home.

Cary police have not named any suspects or persons of interest in the homicide, although they have said they do not believe the crime was random.(Cary police are handling the case, because under state law, law enforcement jurisdiction belongs to the municipality where investigators believe a crime occurred.)

Friends, family and the community held a public memorial service in Cary Saturday for Nancy Cooper. Another memorial service is scheduled for Wednesday in Edmonton, Alberta, where Nancy Cooper's parents live.

Blum said his client, who did not attend Saturday's service, would not attend Wednesday's either because "he feels his presence would be a distraction."

Instead, Cooper will have a private ceremony with friends, Blum said.

RELATED TOPICS: Cary, Raleigh

e-mail print friendly

30 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 30 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
MAybe mogwai will help us understand this if he/she is still on this blog.

wa4mjf,

I believe that some rules of evidence may be in play with the warrants. I would speculate the warrants may avoid explaining to whom ever why the take certain items. Just an assumption on my part though. One other thing here though, the CPD may need this advantage under the circumstances. Brad Cooper is not the only party under scrutiny here. Investigations and the results of them probably are a good idea for all involved.

The only thing I have concern about is that a murderer is "not yet identified" in an "isolated" case. Go figure.

One thing that puzzles me is the oft repeated statements by CPD that he is cooperating, but yet search warrants. I always went with informed consent, when I could, rather than a search warrant as there is less to be challenged in court, should the cooperative person be charged.

"Because of statements made by Chief Bazemore and by his attorney, I believe this guy is in a deep state of sadness and perhaps confusion, and isn't able to function to the capacity to which some of you think is normal."

That's exactly what I'm thinking, Rev. That would explain why he temporarily lost custody, why he's "hiding out" from the public. From the sound of it, he probably wasn't well put together before all this happened, and this nudged him closer to the edge. Whether he "did it" or not.

One wonders if Brad will be at Lake Placid or at the hearing?

http://www.adventuresofbrad.com/joomla/

View Comments VIEW ALL 30 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here