Roanoke Rapids, N.C. — A lawsuit alleging country music singer Randy Parton and others lured the city of Roanoke Rapids into a troubled theater project is frivolous and politically motivated, one of the defendants said Thursday.
"The fact that the city made a decision – or its elected officials made a decision – to do business or to finance the theater – I think that's irrelevant to me or Randy Parton," said Rick Watson, former president and chief executive officer of the Northeastern North Carolina Regional Economic Development Commission.
The North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law – an anti-economic-incentives group funded partially by former conservative state lawmaker Art Pope – filed the suit Thursday. It claims Parton, Watson and others lured the city into an agreement to build the former Randy Parton Theatre so that they could personally profit at taxpayers' expense.
The complaint alleges they made false statements, withheld material facts, breached their fiduciary duties to taxpayers and ignored substantial conflicts of interest.
The city, which issued $21.5 million in bonds to pay for the theater project, is not named in the suit. It does have the option to join in the suit, however.
"I don't know what the definition of 'lure' is, but what we did was go to several communities and ask them if they'd be interested in a venue of this nature," Watson said. "We were concentrating on private developers to form a partnership with Parton and create an entertainment venue."
NCICL is representing Jim Garrett, a Roanoke Rapids resident and a long-time critic of the theater project. It was billed as a way to help boost the city's struggling economy, but critics say it has only ended up costing the city.
“The City of Roanoke Rapids was sold on the concept of the theater as a way to bring new jobs and revitalization to their struggling town,” said Jeanette Doran, NCICL's senior staff attorney. "But all the people got was a $21.5 million debt that they are going to have to repay.”
The city has spent about $739,000 more than it has brought in since the 1,500-seat facility, now called The Roanoke Rapids Theatre, opened in 2006. Part of the loss comes from a $547,000 buyout of Parton's management contract after the city cut ties with him in December.
Roanoke Rapids leaders have considered a 5-cent increase in the property tax rate to help make up for the loss.
"As a taxpayer of Roanoke Rapids, I'm pretty mad," Garrett said at a news conference Thursday. "I think that all of the taxpayers of our city have been taken advantage of."
Parton theater lawsuit 'frivolous,' defendant says
- Reporter: Beau Minnick
- Photographer: Greg Hutchinson
- Web Editor: Kelly Gardner
Copyright 2011 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
15 Comments
| MOST | Viewed | E-mailed | Discussed | |||
Most Viewed Stories
Most Viewed Videos
Most Viewed Slideshows
| ||||||
| MOST | Viewed | E-mailed | Discussed |
Most E-mailed Stories
Most E-mailed Videos | |||
Multimedia
Key dates in the investigation of Lance Armstrong on charges he used performance-enhancing drugs.
Key events in Iran's relations with the West.
An interactive look at the controversial decision and reversal of the Susan G. Komen Foundation to stop funding breast exams at Planned Parenthood.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/travel/2012/02/09/10710709/10710709-1328829176-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wralsportsfan.com/asset/basketball/2012/02/09/10705803/10705803-1328766083-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/lifestyles/travel/2012/02/08/10704761/10704761-1328743348-100x75.jpg)







WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Put the blame, and the demeaning comments, where they belong... on Watson, Dunlow, Beale, et al. It's just ignorant and mean-spirited to continue to beat up on people who are innocent of the acts in question.
June 20, 2008 10:01 a.m.
Yes, there were duplicious politicos involved. Take your pick of several prominent ones. As for any recourse for the gullible citizens of RR ..... I doubt it. They bought in to the con. There is a caveat emptor factor in such cases. They envisioned the best case scenarion ("Branson of The Carolinas" - YEE HAA!) and did not run a proper due diligence on Watson.
Again .... allow the citizenry to tar & feathers the primary perps and any of their associates they can root out.
One would think other communities will take note and be wary .... history says they won't. "..... one born every minute."
June 19, 2008 9:06 p.m.
It was a bad business venture and this money grubbing PAC committee should have been involved much sooner if they thought this was a bad idea.
Vote out the ones who dispersed the money.
Not much else can be done to ruin the reputation of Randy Parton, whether or not he is the crook many of you say he is.
Bottom line: You can't get blood from a turnip.
June 19, 2008 8:58 p.m.
You'll figure that out though.
After he sues you guys for breaking the contract!
June 19, 2008 8:56 p.m.
June 19, 2008 8:17 p.m.