Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

6:06 p.m. • 2-9-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Fri: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Mother sobs when discussing boy's death


e-mail print friendly
Mother sobs when discussing boy's death
Lynn Paddock testifies in court

A Johnston County woman accused of killing her 4-year-old adopted son took the stand Monday at her trial, weeping when describing her own abused childhood and when talking about the dead boy.

Lynn Paddock, 47, is charged with murder in the Feb. 26, 2006, death of Sean Paddock. Authorities said Sean was bound so tightly in blankets that he suffocated.

Defense attorneys have argued that Sean's death was accidental and that Paddock's actions were a form of discipline, not abuse.

"If I could take Sean's place, I would in a heartbeat," a sobbing Paddock told jurors. "That's a feeling I've never felt in my life."

She said she swaddled Sean in a blanket to keep him from getting out of bed at night to play and was stunned to learn he had died one morning.

"I started doing CPR. I thought he was still alive at that point. I thought there was no way he could be dead," she said.

Paddock also broke down on the witness stand as she recounted being raised by an abusive mother who drank and took pills.

"There was this big, very heavy PVC pipe that was also flexible, and that's what she used to discipline us," she said, adding that she was later placed in a foster home.

After trying unsuccessfully to get pregnant, Paddock said, she became interested in adoption upon learning that Dave Thomas, the founder of the Wendy's fast-food chain, encouraged people to adopt older children.

She and her then-husband, Johnny Paddock, adopted six children between the mid-1990s and 2005, when Sean and his biological brother and sister were placed with the family.

Lynn Paddock testified that some of her adopted children came to the couple with emotional issues and that other families didn't want them.

"We decided that, no matter what, we'd take what God brought us. Whatever they needed, we would give it to them," she said.

Deborah Artis, a regional director with the Children's Home Society who worked with Johnny and Lynn Paddock to adopt the children, testified Monday as the first defense witness that four of the adopted children had some emotional problems prior to being adopted.

One of the adopted daughters lied a lot and another spent time at a psychiatric hospital, while one of the adopted sons had anger issues, according to Paddock.

Lynn Paddock said she and her husband decided to use discipline techniques espoused by the Rev. Michael Pearl, an evangelical minister from Tennessee who publishes books and articles on rearing submissive children. She said swatting children with flexible plastic rods was preferred to spanking because it was less demeaning.

"We liked Michael Pearl's (system) because it was quick (and) it didn't demean the child and bring their self-esteem down," she said.

 

She described herself as a submissive wife and said she assumed the role of disciplinarian in the Paddock home because Johnny Paddock once got too angry while disciplining one of the children. Her ex-husband helped her purchase the flexible rods, she said.

Johnny Paddock hasn't been charged in the case, and he said he was willing to testify against his ex-wife, whom he divorced last year while she was in jail awaiting trial.

Prosecutors spent two weeks presenting testimony from the surviving Paddock children about almost daily abuse inflicted by Lynn Paddock and from expert witnesses who called the beatings and restrictions placed on the children "ritualistic abuse."

Lynn Paddock denied claims by some of the children that she wrapped their faces in duct tape or forced Sean and his sister to eat feces. She said she did make Sean's brother eat his own vomit, but said she thought he was acting out like two of the other children.

"I'm very ashamed. Tami and Ray would make themselves vomit, and I thought that's what he was doing too," she said.

Artis said she never physically inspected six children placed with a Johnston County couple because the children seemed to be adjusting well to their new surroundings. The adoption agency performs criminal background checks on prospective adoptive parents and offers them parenting classes, she said.

She wept on the witness stand when she looked at pictures of Sean's body, saying she learned of allegations that Lynn Paddock hit the children with rods and other devices through news coverage of the case.

The adoption agency has a "no-hitting" policy that the Paddocks signed, she said.

Lynn Paddock admitted that she lied to social workers about hitting the children.

Jurors also learned that the Paddocks received $2,200 a month in state subsidies for adopting the children.

RELATED TOPICS: Johnston County

e-mail print friendly

58 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 58 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
I'm quite sure a full background check was done before any adoptions took place, but that's really only helpful if she had been convicted of past crimes, which she obviously was not. I don't think it would be fair to prevent a person who was abused as a child from adopting. I know a woman that had a very abusive childhood and was adopted herself, much like the woman in this story, and I would be the first person to write her a letter of recommendation for adoption a child if she chose to go in that direction.

Does anyone believe this child beater.

NOW FIRST OFF...IM LIKE THE REST OF THE VIEWERS,,,CRYING ONLY COS SHE GOT CAUGHT..WHY DIDNT THE ONES WHO LET HER ADOPT HIM DO A FULL BACKGROUND CHECK ON HER? SHE SHOULDNT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO ADOPT ANY KIDS...IF SHE WAS ABUSED LIKE SHE SAID SHE WAS,,,WHY THE HECK WOULD SHE WANT TO ABUSE INNOCENT KID(S) WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WAT HAPPENED TO HER IN LIFE? HER HUSBAND IS JUST AS MUCH TO BLAME FOR HER ACTIONS...HE HAD TO KNOW SUMTHING WAS GOING ON AND EVEN WITNESSED IT AT SOME POINT OF TIME..HOW COULD HE JUST STAND BACK AND DO NOTHING? WHAT THE HECK IS WRONG WITH THIS WORLD? ANYONE WHO CAN HURT INNOCENT KIDS DONT DESERVE ANY KIDS. ITS SAD HOW PPL CAN TAKE IT OUT ON KIDS WHO HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT HAPPENED IN THEIR LIVES...SHE SHOULD BE PUNISHED TO THE FULLEST.

Mother! Do not call this monster a Mother

And, who care if the woman cries! And who care if she was mistreated as a child. No rights for the monster. Take her out of the world, satin waits with open arms.

View Comments VIEW ALL 58 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here