Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

3:12 a.m. • 2-7-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 60° F
  • Wed: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Thu: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Law's Foes Decry Annexation Without Representation


e-mail print friendly
hearing
hearing

Opponents of North Carolina's involuntary annexation law told state House members at a public hearing Wednesday evening that the law gives too much power to towns and cities.

A House committee charged with recommending changes to the 1959 annexation law listened as more than 100 people came to the Legislative Building auditorium on Jones Street to speak for or against it.

Jerry Santoro told the committee he is surrounded by homes annexed into Raleigh and he is worried his property will be next.

"We feel that if we are annexed, there will be an additional taxes on us that maybe we couldn't afford,” he said.

The law allows towns and cities to annex adjoining land that meets certain population or development-density thresholds. The municipality must hold two public meetings and agree that it will provide emergency and street services to the new citizens. Landowners in the unincorporated areas set to be added don't have to approve the annexation through a referendum, however.

"I think at least we should have a vote for it," Santoro said.

The majority of people attending the public hearing echoed the same message.

"It is all about money. They want it. We have some, and they take it," homeowner Larry Wright said.

Municipal leaders and business boosters who spoke urged the panel to leave the law intact. They said it works well by helping the state manage growth effectively, offering improved water and emergency services to developing areas and raising city populations to bring in new industries and attractions.

"Our continued economic diversification efforts are enhanced and strengthened by our current annexation laws," Asheboro Mayor Pro Tem David Smith said.

"It's a way to have more folks who benefit from the economic strength of the cities," said Chuck Allen, mayor pro tem of Goldsboro.

Others argued that if people tap into city services, they should pay the same as its residents.

"Annexation provides a city with its only mechanism to provide city service. Users become city residents," Greensboro Planning Director Dick Hails said.

Rep. Bruce Goforth, D-Buncombe, said a University of Georgia study found that from 1990-1998, North Carolina annexed almost eight times as many households as the national average.

"There's a lot of unrest in North Carolina over annexation," Goforth said.

The committee, which also held a public hearing in Asheville, can make recommendations to the full House before the General Assembly reconvenes next month.

  • Reporter:
  • Photographer: Anthony Shepherd
  • Web Editor: Minnie Bridgers

RELATED TOPICS: Raleigh

e-mail print friendly

20 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 20 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
These laws must be changed so communities such as Shallotte Point can continue to thrive. Annexation laws can harm rather than help in most cases, and people dwelling in communities who are facing a possible annextion fear the outcomes that could come forth.

This meeting should ensure that the Representatives hear the voices of concerned citizens against forced annexation. Shallotte Point, like so many other comminutues in North Carolina, will not benefit from annexation into town limits. The county already provides all services that the town could offer. Duplicating government to build town revenue is not in the best interest of the citizens.

Last week's forum was an extremely welcome opportunity for concerned and well-spoken citizens, such as those who traveled all the way from Shallotte Point, to make a case against forced annexation. Forced annexation needs to end. Hopefully, the hearing that these citizens received will lead to reformed annexation laws in NC.

North Carolina Annexation Laws are broken, plain and simple!! The Towns and cities are not interested in providing services, if it wasn’t in the law to do so they probably wouldn’t. They are only concerned with collecting more taxes.

Satellite annexations are probably the worse, they end up dividing communities and neighbors. They should be held to the Counties Land Use Plans, instead they allow multi-family condos next to small historic homes.

It’s time for our Legislators to realize that it’s time to protect their citizens from the tyranny of unbridled Towns and Cities.

Thanks to all who attended the annexation hearing.The out dated laws and guidelines for this issue must be changed.I live in an area that has been damaged by satellite annexation.I hope we can have our voices heard and change this existing legislation before it causes more harm in the future.

View Comments VIEW ALL 20 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here