Local News

Probation Director: Oversights 'Flat-Out Embarrassing'

Posted April 2, 2008

— Inadequate staffing, case reassignments and a lack of training led to deficiencies in the supervision of two men now charged in the death of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's student body president.

That's according to a report released Wednesday by the Department of Correction's Division of Community Corrections, which looked into why probation officers overlooked Demario James Atwater, 21, and Laurence Alvin Lovette, 17.

As many as 10 staff touched Atwater's case file and did not address red flags, division Director Robert Guy said, calling it "flat-out embarrassing."

From Feb. 16, 2005 – when he was placed on probation for crimes in Wake County – until March 28, 2006, six probation officers saw Atwater eight times. No one made contact with him again until April 2007, the report said.

There is also no evidence of criminal record-checks during that 13-month period, even though Granville and Durham county authorities arrested Atwater three times, which such checks should have revealed.

A probation officer began filing paperwork for his arrest when he never showed for meetings, but it was never completed.

"That is unacceptable. The supervision of Mr. Atwater on probation by this division is extremely disappointing," Guy said. "It's totally unacceptable by our standards – by any agency's standards."

But Guy said that even if the agency had efficiently followed its own procedures, both defendants could have been free from custody when the students were killed.

"There's no guarantee that they would have not been on the street," he said.

Guy said no one has yet been fired, but three senior probation officials in Wake County have been reassigned. The agency is conducting performance audits in both Wake and Durham, and other temporary and permanent disciplinary actions may be forthcoming.

"This is a dark cloud over our agency," Guy said. "But guess what? We'll remove that cloud."

Among the red flags in Atwater's case, discrepancies in a judge's order and case file were never resolved. Atwater also told probation officers on several occasions he had moved to Durham, but they never transferred the case there because Atwater owed money to the court.

"Wake County staff should have requested courtesy supervision from Durham County until the money violations had been reported to the Wake County court," the report said.

In the case of Lovette, – who's also charged in the fatal shooting of Duke University graduate student Abhijit Mahato – his probation officer was assigned to 127 cases, although she had not completed basic training.

Although she tried contacting him, Lovette never met with her during the six-week period between Mahato's and Carson's deaths other than an initial meeting on the day he was processed in the system.

Guy said the officer, Chalita Nicole Thomas, never should have handled Lovette's case because she should have been on administrative duty following her being charged in December with driving while impaired.


This story is closed for comments.

Oldest First
View all
  • nickholt99 Apr 3, 2008

    Tarheelturtle - who was your grandfather? Perhaps I worked under him?

    Lili - do I know you?

    I have worked with intake units and without. Even though working intake was a pain, having a unit do it wasnt much better. You had to go back and get things corrected and wait for paperwork. At least you could clear your calendar for the most part when you knew you had intake.

    And as for most of those things you listed, I did all that as a regular PO as part of my job. I loved going to Court. I also loved going looking for people. I had a couple of exciting searches/chases with a fellow PO.


    Yeah Right !

    Missed by one is oversight, Missed by ten is incompetence !

    Dereliction of duties !

  • Raptor06 Apr 3, 2008

    Those oversights weren't just "embarrassing," they were deadly!

    BLOCKHEAD SQUARED - valid statement. I have to remember that one!

  • mugofstout2 Apr 3, 2008

    Start giving the felons crushing , terrible punishment, and things will get better. Do away with probation. Make them live with no TV, scant food, no heat or cooling. Make prison terrible.


    "Repeat Offender" is just glorified word for "Valued Customer"

  • dplowman Apr 3, 2008

    Fire them all and start over

  • Sweetgrl3 Apr 3, 2008

    Court Intake is still around!

  • bjeanr Apr 3, 2008

    "Embarrassing" is an UNDERSTATEMENT!!!!

  • lili64 Apr 3, 2008

    Nick, a lot has changed since you left. Not all areas have units that specifically work court. That leaves a community officer to work court 2-5/mth maybe more depending on the size of the area you are assigned(District & Superior)who may have 110-145 cases they run record checks/completing violation reports/hearings/return phone calls to victims/staffing cases/doing case reviews for the month/paroling parolees(different from probation)/verifying residences/risk assessments(1hr min)/conducting office visit/entering notes for things you have done on that case in the computer(not everyone is a speedtyper)/conducting drug testing on probationers and parolees/attending required training and there is a lot more.

    I say bring back court intake. It worked. One of the best and most beneficial positions the department ever had and let the officers get back to supervising. Officers should not work court and try to supervise cases.

  • TarheelTurtle Apr 3, 2008

    The last time Hunt was Governor my Granddaddy was Director of Adult Probation and Parole for the State. During his tenure they had the lowesr recitivism rate EVER in the history of this dept., before or since. This is shameful and with any luck, the dept will be swept clean, top to bottom. I know GD is rolling over in his grave right now at this.