Durham, N.C. — One person since last September has been slapped with an interruption of service for violating Durham's water restrictions, prompting a City Council member to call local restrictions a failure.
The average daily demand for water in Durham is down about 10 percent from a year ago, although water use has been higher in recent weeks than it was in January.
"It's a joke," Councilman Eugene Brown said. "There's really no reason to call it whatever stage you want of water conservation if you don't enforce it."
Since Raleigh ratcheted up its water-use rules on Feb. 15, city officials have issued eight $1,000 fines to violators. Dozens of homeowners faced smaller fines last fall for breaking earlier regulations.
By contrast, Durham doesn't issue fines – restoring water service does entail a $400 fee – choosing to issue warnings and notices of violation. About 230 warnings for first offenses have been issued since September, and repeat offenders have been cited seven times.
Brown said Durham needs stricter penalties for violators. He has asked the city water department to come up with new enforcement guidelines within the next few weeks.
"The only way to do this is with fines, and it appears Raleigh is finally waking up and doing a much better job in that arena than we are," he said.
City officials said they don't have the manpower to police water violations. Two people are out on the streets to check for violations, officials said, noting a city employee usually has to catch someone in the act for a notice of violation to be issued.
"This should have been discussed last fall when we went to that stage," Brown said.
Durham resident Michael Hayes said he would like to see personal accountability and initiative among local residents.
"We can't wait for the government to take care of these issues. People are really going to have to step up and do something," said Hayes, who has installed four rain barrels and low-flow toilets at his house.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/share/2012/02/09/10711513/4f348e7981bb5-51x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2012/02/11/10719067/10719072-1329050037-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)







WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
We do? Our plant has cut back substantially. Where are the facts to support your statement? Show us the data. Support your unsubstantiated claim.
February 28, 2008 11:53 a.m.
My guess is all the affluent water users are ignoring the laws, thinking that they can just pay the fines and keep watering....
February 26, 2008 10:26 a.m.
February 26, 2008 9:42 a.m.
Did anyone see the recent poll on one of the news channels (I forget which one), that showed 46% of the people they asked DO NOT do anything to conserve?? THat's ludicrous! A small percentage admitted they actually use more water. So that leaves 46% of us who are actually doing something to conserve. Sorry folks- but the government cannot be held completely responsible because we aren't doing OUR part. Yes, they can and should do alot of things differently, but we're adults. Let's act like it.
February 26, 2008 9:30 a.m.
February 26, 2008 9:10 a.m.