Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

9:59 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Alert

  • Breaking News:  The UNC Board of Governors passed President Tom Ross' recommended tuition increase plan Friday for an average 8.8 percent hike in 2012-2013. The plan now goes before state lawmakers for approval.

Raleigh Might Pass Cost of Drought Onto Residents


e-mail print friendly
Water faucet generic
Water faucet generic

The drought has taken a toll everywhere: people's daily lives, their pocketbooks and municipalities' public utilities budgets. Raleigh officials were considering a 50 percent surcharge to pass that cost onto residents.

The City Council referred the proposal by Mayor Charles Meeker to the Public Works Committee. Meeker argued that the surcharge – applied to every residential customers' water bill – would serve dual purposes: encourage conservation and help raise funds for the city's Department of Public Utilities.

"We aren't supported by taxpayers' money, so we are only supported by water and sewer bills," said Ed Buchan, a water specialist with the public-utilities department. The surcharge could "make up for anticipated loss revenue if we don't have the ability to permit regulation this year," he added.

On Jan. 8, the City Council passed several water-conservation regulations proposed by Meeker – including a continued ban on outdoor watering. That measure, in particular, threatens the budget of the city's public-utilities department, officials said.

Overall, the Department of Public Utilities stands to use tens of millions of dollars, Meeker estimated. The department uses its funds to replace and maintain water lines and build water treatment plants.

"We're at a point now where capital improvement projects are very important, and they're very expensive now," Buchan said. "Historically, Raleigh has been very fortunate in being able to sort of delay having to do a lot of these things."

Those budgetary considerations, though, did not fly with some residents and at least one councilman.

"It seems like everything is attached to money, and I think that's wrong," Raleigh resident J.C. Edwards said.

Councilman Russ Stephenson proposed implementing a tiered water rate structure that would target high-water users, both residential and commercial.

Meeker said the city's billing system can not handle tiered rates, but city officials were looking at upgrading the software in the next couple years.

Resident Christine Floyd questioned whether she could cut back on her water use more than she has already.

"I drink about five bottles a day," Floyd said. "I cook with it everyday, shower with it. I don't know, it's really important."

RELATED TOPICS: Russ Stephenson, Charles Meeker, Raleigh

e-mail print friendly

141 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 141 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments.

Latest Comments
Why do cities and counties require persons to abandon perfectly good wells when they pass their pipes by their homes?

Do some more math! A 50% increase is a 50% increase. Do not try to hide the results by saying if one did this or one did that!

In the real world when revenues go down, you cut expenses through cost reduction and payroll reductions. In the world of government, you just charge the taxpayers another tax.

The good thing is that Meeker and his Socialist allies on the City Council won't get re-elected in 2009 after adding the 50% tax on Water. Bet they forget to remove this temporary tax when it starts raining.

double06. Under a properly tiered structure, you would not pay extra if you do not consume EXCESS water levels. Your bill would be under your discretion and control.

Now, that is "assuming" that a properly structured solution that provides incentive for conservation and responsiblity for excess while supporting water services "fund" is put into place.

View Comments VIEW ALL 141 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here