Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

5:47 a.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Rain.
    • Hi: 58° F
  • Sat: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 54° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Durham Police Accused of Evidence Tampering


e-mail print friendly
Durham Police Accused of Evidence Tampering
Durham Police Accused of Evidence Tampering

The defense attorney for a man charged last May with trafficking cocaine says police intentionally withheld and tampered with an audio tape before turning it over as evidence.

Ten minutes of audio from the Interstate 85 traffic stop in which Officer J.J. McDonough found 11 pounds of cocaine in Kenneth Perry's car is missing, his attorney, Bob Brown said. The cruiser's video system recorded the stop, and audio continued to record while Perry sat in the police cruiser after being arrested and McDonough spoke to his wife on his cell phone.

"They said they erased it, because they didn't want us to overhear a conversation that was carried on between the officer and his wife," Brown said in court hearing Thursday on a motion for a senior resident Superior Court judge to assume jurisdiction of the case.

Durham County Assistant District Attorney Jim Dornfried said the original tape was intact, but admitted police handed over a copy as evidence with some audio edited from it.

"The part in question that the defense counsel claims has been altered, the state doesn't believe has been altered," Dornfried said.

Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Orlando Hudson reminded Dornfried it is the court's job to decide what evidence is or is not relevant, comparing the situation with former prosecutor Mike Nifong's withholding evidence in the Duke lacrosse case.

"You can't make a tape come out the way they want it to come out," Hudson said. "That's what's wrong with this situation. I don't see that being any different than people working with the DA's office and deciding certain DNA shouldn't come out."

Durham Police Chief Jose Lopez said department policy is to not alter evidence in any way. He said his office is reviewing the tape and the officer's actions.

"If they're doing it in this case, they're probably doing it in other cases," Brown said.

But police and prosecutors insist there is nothing to hide, calling the decision to hand over the edited tape a bad one on the officer's part.

RELATED TOPICS: Durham County, Durham

e-mail print friendly

15 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 15 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
11 lbs of cocaine doesn't make him a criminal in my eyes, it does to those who get made because they don't have the taxes off of that cocaine. I could care less if he had 111 lbs, I'd chop it up for him and let him snort his brain away.

It's known as a "victim-less" crime

But given Durham's recent track record, nothing surprises me coming out of that portion of the state, even corrupt law enforcement

anitov.. "So most of you are more worried about a portion of audio tape than a criminal having 11 pounds of cocaine?"

You are missing the point. We are worried about disclosure and tampering of evidence. Remember when DNA evidence was not disclosed three young men almost went to the big house. This for a sexual assault crime that existed only in the minds of one woman, all of the Durham police force, the prosecutor, all the city officials and half the academic staff at Duke University.

The point is that maybe if evidence needs altering then maybe there was no 11 pounds of cocaine.

I may be missing the entire point of this article. Law Enforcement Officers attempted to tamper with evidence in a criminal case. What gives them license to tamper with evidence, regardless of where the cocaine is located? Me thinks that was the Judges question. Video tape in this case, but what if was their sworn statement against YOU? Had enough Noth Calina?

So most of you are more worried about a portion of audio tape than a criminal having 11 pounds of cocaine?

............ nothing that happens in Durham surprises me........!!

View Comments VIEW ALL 15 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here