Raleigh, N.C. — Three Wake County mayors sharply criticized Thursday the Wake County school system's latest reassignment plan for elementary school students.
Wake County schools are bracing for another 6,000 students in 2008-09. District administrators said the reassignment plan for elementary students would help to fill seats in new schools and balance out dropping enrollment in other schools.
When they announced the plan last week, administrators also said they wanted to keep an economic balance in schools so no school has too many poor or too many well-to-do students.
As part of the reassignment, more than 3,000 students will be moved from traditional-calendar schools to year-round schedules.
Superior Court Judge Howard Manning ruled in May that the district couldn't require students to attend a year-round school without parental consent. Hundreds of parents opted out of switching to year-round schools last summer, leaving many traditional-calendar schools overcrowded this fall.
Apex Mayor Keith Weatherly, Garner Mayor Ronnie Williams and Holly Springs Mayor Dick Sears on Thursday joined members of Wake Cares, the community organization that sued the district over the year-round conversion plan, to express frustration with the new reassignment plan.
"Our issue is not about reassignment. It's about how reassignments are done," Williams said.
"This is a kids issue, not necessarily a numbers issue," Sears said. "Kids. They're real, live people. They have parents who want to support the schools. These reassignment plans completely knock that concept apart."
Reassignments cause confusion and disruption in local communities and turn families into pawns, Weatherly said, adding that the school district should be more concerned with educational excellence than enrollment diversity.
School board Chairwoman Rosa Gill said the district needs to shuffle students to make room for growth.
"We weigh what we have to do to provide access to all students, and then we try to come up with the best solution," Gill said.
But Dawn Graff, one of the founders of Wake Cares, said half of the students being reassigned are for diversity and not to fill new schools. Some students would be forced to attend their third school in three years under the proposal, she said.
"Every year, the policies and the actions of the (school) board affect more and more families and disrupt more schools. This is bad for the community and bad for our children," said Kathleen Brennan, another founder of Wake Cares. "The Wake County Public School System has lost its focus and continues to be more concerned with reassigning students than with educating them."
School officials have said students will be guaranteed a seat in a traditional school if they don't want to attend the year-round school to which they're assigned.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/share/2012/02/09/10711513/4f348e7981bb5-51x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2012/02/11/10719067/10719072-1329050037-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)







WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
It's not the healthiest for society. You've never tried the other way apparently. How do you know it won't work? It's worked for thousands of years past. Do you really think things are better now with the type of rat race we're in?
No one is saying legislate this as a requirement but a blind person could see the public school system doesn't work. We're "behind" other countries, big time!
December 14, 2007 5:29 p.m.
My child also appreciates me and we do spend time together, but time apart is healthy for a child too. My son is incredibly independent for a 7 yr old. I still make every soccer game, and practice, and attend all his taekwondo events (that is what they make vacation for). Do not assume that your way is the only way. We work just as hard and sacrafice just as much as you do, just in a different way.
December 14, 2007 1:45 p.m.
Why can't my child still grow up and be smart and sucessful and attend a public school?? Also why is it Mom that you suggest stays home? Your way is not the only successful way to raise a child. I attended public schools, and I survived. What they acheive in their life/ and academics has a whole lot to do with the values you teach at home. You do not have to be a stay at home mom to have good values. My life style sets a great example for what I want my child's future to look like. I acheived my degree while I worked a full time job, and was a mom. I perservered and worked hard to graduate with a 3.6 GPA. I have held jobs with increasing responsibilities and good pay, at the same company for 10 yrs. I appreciate my degree because it was not handed to me by Mom and Dad, I worked for it on my own and still made it.
December 14, 2007 1:42 p.m.
You'll enjoy better seeing a grown child that is intelligent and responsible and one that will never forget the sacrifice in lifestyle you made for him or her. Now don't that beat an 'ole job or paycheck? Isn't that the greatest accomplishment for a parent?
December 14, 2007 12:48 p.m.
Your lifestyle is not for everyone, as mine is not for everyone. It takes all types to make up the world, and I choose to have a career. It is not about the "sucess", because I make a modest living at my job, and do not hold a title impressive enough to mention. But I have come to enjoy working.
December 14, 2007 8:38 a.m.