Raleigh, N.C. — City officials will review proposals to double the fees paid by developers on new homes and to limit the size of new homes after the two ideas were presented to the City Council on Tuesday.
Mayor Charles Meeker wants to double the impact fee charged to developers, from $1,200 to about $2,500 per new home, saying Raleigh's fees are lower than those charged in other cities. Such an increase would raise an extra $8 million to $10 million for parks and roads, he said.
City staff will examine the proposal, including whether Raleigh has the legal right to raise impact fees that high, in the coming weeks.
The Raleigh Planning Commission will review proposals to handle infill development. Meeker last month suggested limiting the size of new homes built on lots where previous homes were razed, saying many people have complained that large homes, often called "McMansions," detract from the character of older neighborhoods.
After numerous people complained about Meeker's proposal, city planners devised two alternatives to resolve the issue. One would limit the size of replacement homes or expansions to 125 percent of the size of the older home, while the other would use Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts to set building standards in specific neighborhoods.
A resolution to create a city policy governing the use of public financing for private development also was read into the record Tuesday and likely will be discussed by the council in January.
Developer John Kane has asked for $75 million in tax-increment financing to pay for a parking deck at his North Hills mixed-use project off Six Forks Road. Such financing requires the city to borrow money and to repay the loan through with revenue generated from higher tax valuations on the project and nearby properties.
The resolution calls for limiting public financing to developments in blighted areas that might not occur without such support. Also, Wake County would have to provide similar support for such projects.
Kane couldn't be reached for comment Tuesday.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717043/10717043-1328939633-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
December 5, 2007 9:47 a.m.
December 4, 2007 8:27 p.m.
Everyday Meeker sounds more and more like Chavez in Venezula.
Meeker is advocating a $2500 tax for anyone who builds a new home. Seeing that the developer isn't going to pay this fee. It's one more additional tax along with others including an increased trash fee and the stormwater fee that Meeker has passed onto the overtaxed citizens of Raleigh.
Meeker has never met a new fee or tax that he didn't embrace. These additional fees and taxes are in place to cover the cost of the Socialist programs that Meeker is funding out of the general fund.
The City Manager says that we need to be competitive with other cities in North Carolina by raising our taxes. Personally this is a competition that I would like to lose. It seems that we should be competitive by lowering our taxes instead of raising them.
December 4, 2007 6:13 p.m.
Ah, I love it! There's no problem spending millions of taxpayer's money to fix up blighted areas, but heaven forbid anyone should be able to build a bigger, taller house than the crack house next door! Let's just keep those poor homeowner's down by limiting the desire for anyone to buy them out because of the "character" that's so dear to the neighborhood liberals.
December 4, 2007 6:04 p.m.
December 4, 2007 5:59 p.m.