Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

8:51 p.m. • 5-21-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Wed: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 86° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 76° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2007-11-21 00:35:00
Updated: 2007-11-21 06:08:58

Standing Room Only for Hearing Over Proposal to Curb McMansions


McMansions
McMansions
print friendly

A controversial plan that could limit the size of a home in Raleigh drew a packed crowd Tuesday night.

Driving the proposal is concern over so-called "McMansions," which homeowners of older residences say detract from the character of their neighborhoods.

But folks against zoning regulations under consideration by the City Council came out in droves for Tuesday's public hearing. They argue that tight restrictions would cause home values to drop and limit property rights.

“The measure is too restrictive. It puts the entire city under a one-size-fits-all solution,” opponent Kristen Monahan said.

“Your actions may very well cause the value in people's homes to disappear,” Wake County Commissioner Paul Coble said.

“Come up with something that meets the needs for the community as well as the rights of property,” homeowner Allen Burris said.

The proposal would increase required setbacks from property lines from 5 feet to 10 feet on either side of the house and from 20 to 30 feet in the back yard and reduce the maximum height of homes from 40 feet to 32 feet.

Almost 600 homes have been knocked down in Raleigh in the last five years to make way for larger residences, with most of the activity concentrated inside the Beltline north of Wade Avenue and west of Wake Forest Road, according to a city report released in September.

Those sites are known as "scrapes."

There is also another proposal that would put more restrictions on a new home that replaces an older home. Raleigh's city planners said that would not be debated until next month.


129 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 129 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
This story is SO misreported (I should have seen it coming by the use of "McMansion", which is not a funny term). In fact, in a standing room only crowd of interested public, NOT A SINGLE PERSON argued FOR the regulations. It was a decisive roar against this specific set of changes to construction regulation.

If the election of McFarlane, Stephenson, etc was a "mandate", one also must consider the complete dearth of support this proposal had.

Personally, I think the fuss is mostly over the lack of architectural taste in many new "replacement houses" (that is the correct term, Sloane, for when a "McMansion" replaces a "McDump"). Taste is incredibly hard to legislate as some of these most objectionable replacement houses actually comply to this heavily rejected proposed standard.

One of Raleigh's problems is that it didn't have enough wealth to build many large beautiful houses when the ITB area was developed. There's nothing wrong with correcting this mistake; just do it with charm!

just because you can does not mean you always should. I am glad I dont have to hear my neighbor snore or take a #2 b/c that means he could hear me too. Ignorance, intelligence and attitude make for an ugly mix , add a little disregard for others and it makes for entertainment value no amount of money can buy!

Who cares how high the house on the next lot is? Seems to me the higher tax value of the larger house would help soften the tax burden on the "normal" height homes in a neighborhood.

I would love to see larger nicer houses build around mine. Maybe it would keep the value of my property up instead of letting things around get dilapidated. One nice big new house replacing multiple older houses sounds okay to me. If the people own the older homes left, I would think that would be good for them. If the remaining are rentals, the people living there shouldn't have a say anyway.

What makes a mansion a "McMansion?"

View Comments VIEW ALL 129 COMMENTS