Raleigh, N.C. — A controversial plan that could limit the size of a home in Raleigh drew a packed crowd Tuesday night.
Driving the proposal is concern over so-called "McMansions," which homeowners of older residences say detract from the character of their neighborhoods.
But folks against zoning regulations under consideration by the City Council came out in droves for Tuesday's public hearing. They argue that tight restrictions would cause home values to drop and limit property rights.
“The measure is too restrictive. It puts the entire city under a one-size-fits-all solution,” opponent Kristen Monahan said.
“Your actions may very well cause the value in people's homes to disappear,” Wake County Commissioner Paul Coble said.
“Come up with something that meets the needs for the community as well as the rights of property,” homeowner Allen Burris said.
The proposal would increase required setbacks from property lines from 5 feet to 10 feet on either side of the house and from 20 to 30 feet in the back yard and reduce the maximum height of homes from 40 feet to 32 feet.
Almost 600 homes have been knocked down in Raleigh in the last five years to make way for larger residences, with most of the activity concentrated inside the Beltline north of Wade Avenue and west of Wake Forest Road, according to a city report released in September.
Those sites are known as "scrapes."
There is also another proposal that would put more restrictions on a new home that replaces an older home. Raleigh's city planners said that would not be debated until next month.


![[READ STORY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/national_world/national/2013/05/14/12445890/12446751-1368816960-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/news/local/2013/05/13/12441232/hahn-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/28/12278304/LNL-100x75.jpg)
![[VIEW PAGE]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/traffic/2009/07/23/5645694/beltline-100x75.jpg)
![[GALLERY]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/2013/03/04/12182235/12182236-1362457268-100x75.jpg)

WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
If the election of McFarlane, Stephenson, etc was a "mandate", one also must consider the complete dearth of support this proposal had.
Personally, I think the fuss is mostly over the lack of architectural taste in many new "replacement houses" (that is the correct term, Sloane, for when a "McMansion" replaces a "McDump"). Taste is incredibly hard to legislate as some of these most objectionable replacement houses actually comply to this heavily rejected proposed standard.
One of Raleigh's problems is that it didn't have enough wealth to build many large beautiful houses when the ITB area was developed. There's nothing wrong with correcting this mistake; just do it with charm!
November 21, 2007 5:38 p.m.
November 21, 2007 4:45 p.m.
November 21, 2007 4:36 p.m.
November 21, 2007 4:17 p.m.
November 21, 2007 4:11 p.m.