Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

2:17 a.m. • 5-20-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 78° F
  • Tue: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 84° F
  • Wed: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 86° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2007-11-13 19:15:00
Updated: 2007-11-13 19:18:54

Highway, Legal Systems Contribute to N.C. Gun Trafficking


Gun Trafficking
Gun Trafficking
print friendly

North Carolina ranks No. 7 in the nation for illegal gun trafficking. Last year, more than 11,000 illegal firearms were recovered, many used in violent crimes.

But why does the state carry that dubious distinction?

A deadly drive by shooting on Raleigh's Beauty Avenue netted 15 arrests – all of them gang members, or affiliated with a gang.

"Violent crime and gangs and guns are synonymous," said Earl Woodham, an agent with the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Woodham said a gun is a gang member's courage.

"It, all of a sudden, ratchets up the testosterone of the gang member," he said. "A gang member with his bare hands succumbs real quick to an armed police officer."

Woodham said drying up the source for guns is one way to sap a gang's strength.

But the state's system of highways, such as Interstate 95 – dubbed the "Iron Pipeline" – makes it one of the top 10 sources for illegal guns in the United States.

"Easy access to these interstates has not helped one bit in deterring illegal firearms being trafficked to other states,"

The illegal gun trade in North Carolina is driven by supply and demand and aided by existing laws. Woodham said a person caught selling guns would face one-fifth the jail time than someone caught selling drugs.

"The risk is a lot less," he said. "The reward is a lot higher to traffic fire arms out of North Carolina for just as much, or more, profit."

Tracing gun sales can be a key piece of evidence at trial, but the rules for licensing weapons only go so far.

"If we want to know who had that gun after the first purchaser, we have to physically go out and investigate it just like you would for a homicide or bank robbery, because that's where the paper trail ends."

What doesn't end is the stream of guns bought, sold, found or stolen in North Carolina. Nor does the work of investigators, who operate within a system they consider frustrating.

Some experts, such as Woodham, say the answer is not to ban all guns – just respect them and the law.

Woodham said most licensed dealers abide by the law. It's the ones who don't, and the people who seize the opportunity to buy illegal weapons that put North Carolina high on the list.


28 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 28 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
Molon Labe!

"If you ban weapons, you are only hurting the people the have them legally. Someone who is going to break the law will commit a crime to get a gun and use it. If only criminals have weoapons, they win. The police will only react to after the fact. Police will investigate your death. I guess we can go back to throwing rocks."

Not if you ban their manufacture and then round them all up & destroy them ...

If you ban weapons, you are only hurting the people the have them legally. Someone who is going to break the law will commit a crime to get a gun and use it. If only criminals have weoapons, they win. The police will only react to after the fact. Police will investigate your death. I guess we can go back to throwing rocks.

"Well, I'm no attorney, but it seems to me to be massively disingenuous to selectivly interpret the "we" and "the people" phrases as either individual or collective right statements, based on where it falls in the Constitution, either for free speech, the 2nd Amendment or whatever the argument du jour is and which side of it those doing the arguing come down on."

How so? "We the People" appears solely in the preamble, which constructs and guarantees no rights at all, but merely explains the rationale for having executed the Constitution in the first place.

Well, I'm no attorney, but it seems to me to be massively disingenuous to selectivly interpret the "we" and "the people" phrases as either individual or collective right statements, based on where it falls in the Constitution, either for free speech, the 2nd Amendment or whatever the argument du jour is and which side of it those doing the arguing come down on.

My position on this? Having a handgun saved me from a mugging one night here in Raleigh a few years ago (two of them vs one of me), and just a few days ago, my girlfriend frightened off a group of home invading thieves at about 11pm by shouting out "I have a gun and get out of the house now!" She faced down at least 3 bad guys with just a threat, I am awfully proud of her and her performance under pressure

View Comments VIEW ALL 28 COMMENTS