Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

11:12 p.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sat: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Durham Officials Mum on Lacrosse Lawsuit Situation


e-mail print friendly
Duke Lacrosse Legal
Duke Lacrosse Legal

Durham City Council members were tight-lipped Thursday after a closed-door meeting about a potential federal civil rights lawsuit by three former Duke lacrosse players falsely accused of rape and sexual assault.

Council members left the session without comment, but the issue has already assumed a central role in the Durham mayoral race.

Last month, civil attorneys for David Evans, Collin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann met with the city's attorney and gave the city until early October to respond to a reported $30 million settlement to avoid the suit.

The players maintain their rights were violated in the yearlong investigation, in which they were indicted, then later declared innocent, of allegations that they raped, sexually assaulted and beat an exotic dancer at a team party.

Council members must decide whether to agree to the settlement, which also includes reforms to the legal process; to negotiate a different settlement or to fight a possible lawsuit.

Evans, Finnerty and Seligmann are each seeking about $10 million, their attorneys told The Associated Press last month.

In addition, attorneys are seeking the creation of ombudsman positions to review complaints of misconduct about North Carolina district attorneys, and they want Durham city officials to lead the lobbying for any legal changes that would require action by the state's General Assembly, a person close to the case told The AP.

The City Council must also decide whether to proceed with an independent panel examining the Durham Police Department's handling of the case. The possibility of a lawsuit has stalled the panel's probe because the city's insurance company is concerned about how any findings could affect a lawsuit.

Mayor Bill Bell and at least three City Council members called for the probe after an internal department report found no wrongdoing on investigators' part.

A document showing a timeline of police activity in the lacrosse case, which was made public this week, showed Bell met with police early on in the case.

Bell said he wanted to find out if lacrosse players were cooperating with investigators and he wanted to let officers know he was worried about mounting tensions.

Councilman Thomas Stith, who is running against Bell for mayor in next week's election, said Bell pressured police to solve the case quickly. That could increase the city's liability in the lacrosse players' potential suit, he said.

"The only reason we're even talking about this now is because someone on this council wants to discredit me for his own political gain," Bell said. "It's petty, exploitive and a waste of people's time."

"The real issue is, was the process pushed forward by a higher level? When asked that, the mayor became forgetful," Stith said.

RELATED TOPICS: Mayor Bill Bell, Durham, Civil Rights

e-mail print friendly

48 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 48 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
A little "side topic" opinion related to Duke's "Gang of 88". I believe that the settlement Duke University made protects these misguided professors. If the Duke student body really wanted to try for change and removal of these fools, students would refuse to take classes from those who signed their name to that horrid and damning advertisement. If the classes are empty, perhaps the University would find a way to push them out. Tenure is a terrible thing when its purpose is misused. Why didn't these same profs take out an ad apologizing for being wrong and out of place?

AS for Durham and Duke, I don't want my kid to go there to become a target because he is white. There are too many good options to select such a hostile environment: Columbia, Princeton, Stanford, Yale,etc.

"then how come it was not obvious to anyone else whe this thing started?"

It was, it was wholly ignored by Nifong, DPD and everyone else who wanted this case to go forward for a variety of reasons.

My question is this. If Mangum is so mentally unstable, and it is so obvious to the DA and others without her having to be examined by a shrink, then how come it was not obvious to anyone else whe this thing started?

68 Polaris is right; WE elected this fool, knowing that he was predicial against the boys. WE must pay for these actions! I suggest that we, all of us, are forced to dance for the Duke players at their next party. It will be embarassing, but we must make amends.

Mangum will never face any responsibility, personally or through the legal system. The AG made sure of that. Durham PD and Nifong made sure of that.

She won't even be charged with filing a false police report, although only a misdemeanor charge when she already has a record that includes felony charges from prior bad acts.

What makes me wonder is this. If the AG found her to be so mentally unstable to face charges in this matter, why does she still have her three fatherless children in her care?

View Comments VIEW ALL 48 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here