Durham, N.C. — Duke University said Wednesday it hopes to reach a fair resolution with unindicted members of its 2006 men's lacrosse team who are reportedly considering filing a lawsuit.
"Duke University has been in discussions with representatives of the families for many months and is happy to continue discussions with their new representatives," according to a university statement.
Forty-six of the team's 47 players were required to give DNA samples under a non-testimonial order in March 2006 after an exotic dancer reported being raped, sexually assaulted and beaten by three white team members.
In the days and weeks that followed, the team postponed two games and was later suspended from play for the rest of the season.
News of the alleged attack also sparked days of protest at Duke and in Durham, with protesters handing out and posting fliers bearing the photos and names of the lacrosse players.
Eighty-eight Duke professors and staff also endorsed a full-page advertisement in the student newspaper, which some say they feel were convicting the lacrosse players before anyone was charged.
The lacrosse players remained relatively quiet about the case but, through their attorneys, denied the allegations. They did admit to underage drinking.
The case ultimately unfolded with the three accused teammates – Reade Seligmann, Collin Finnerty and David Evans – being cleared of charges of first-degree rape, kidnapping and sexual assault.
Duke has already settled with at least five parties. In June, Duke settled with all three men, but the terms were never disclosed.
The university also reached a financial settlement with former lacrosse coach Mike Pressler, who was forced to resign shortly after the rape allegations surfaced. Terms of that agreement were not disclosed either.
And in May, it settled a suit filed by one of the undindicted players who claimed he received a failing grade in a class because he was a member of the lacrosse team.
Duke 'in Discussions' With Unindicted Lacrosse Players
RELATED TOPICS: Duke University, Durham
Copyright 2011 by Capitol Broadcasting Company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
145 Comments
| MOST | Viewed | E-mailed | Discussed | ||
Most Viewed Stories
Most Viewed Videos
Most Viewed Slideshows
| |||||
| MOST | Viewed | E-mailed | Discussed |
Most E-mailed Stories
Most E-mailed Videos | |||
Multimedia
Key dates in the investigation of Lance Armstrong on charges he used performance-enhancing drugs.
Key events in Iran's relations with the West.
An interactive look at the controversial decision and reversal of the Susan G. Komen Foundation to stop funding breast exams at Planned Parenthood.



![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.wral.com/asset/entertainment/out_and_about/2012/02/04/10712136/pics_agunn53833-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717011/10717011-1328936455-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717059/10717059-1328939591-100x75.jpg)
![[SLIDESHOW]](http://wwwcache.highschoolot.com/asset/content/2012/02/11/10717043/10717043-1328939633-100x75.jpg)






WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.
This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Duke most likely violated its'own policy of due process which may leave room for a Title VII claim.
September 28, 2007 8:47 a.m.
If nothinig more there is most likely a contract violation. There may be a defamation claim.
September 28, 2007 8:43 a.m.
September 28, 2007 8:35 a.m.
Part of the lawsuit against the city stipulates that it must include changes to protocol and policies used to press charges - as it was painfully clear, the police violated their own policy for the photo ID process, not to mention ignoring evidence of innocence and altering notes (Gottlieb on the notes) to make the innocent evidence seem irrelevant in the timeline issues.
There are many dirty hands on this case in Durham, many. And it started long before any investigation was done, I would say the first salvo came from Cpl Addison who stated their guilt on the Crimestoppers poster....it was clear they were making a case prior to investigation and pronouncing guilt publicly. It wasn't just Nifong.
September 27, 2007 10:42 p.m.
I am with you. I would love to see the case of the 3 players against durham go to trial. You have people who have been incorrectly incarcerated for many years not getting the kind of settlement the duke boys are asking for. And they didn't spend a single night in jail. It will be very interesting to see how all this plays out.
Lastly, it would set a high profile precedent for any other cases involving prosecutorial misconduct. I think if they are successful we will be seeing a whole lot more lawsuits like this across the country.
September 27, 2007 10:33 p.m.