Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

Login Options

11:40 p.m. • 2-10-12

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Sat: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 52° F
  • Sun: Clear.
    • Hi: 43° F
  • Mon: Mostly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 50° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Marketplace Links

Social Links

Main Menu

Could Land Transfer Tax Pay for Wake Growth?


e-mail print friendly
Could Land Transfer Tax Pay For Wake Co. Growth?
Could Land Transfer Tax Pay For Wake Co. Growth?

A citizen's group, Wake Up Wake County, is pushing for the county to vote on implementing a land transfer tax, which it said could make growth pay for itself.

The 2007 General Assembly gave permission for counties to seek voter approval for a 0.4 percent transfer tax that owners would pay when selling any piece of real estate. In Wake County, the tax could raise an estimated $50 million a year.

Tax proponents said that money could fund the county's infrastructure needs amid rapid growth.

"Our population is due to double in just 20 years, and we've got to plan for the future," Karen Ridge, with Wake Up Wake County, said. "We've got to figure out fair ways to pay for the infrastructure needs that come with growth."

Some realtors, though, said the tax could hamper the very growth it's meant to sustain, tightening the housing market and making sales more difficult to make. Builders have also opposed the tax, saying it unfairly singles out a small segment of the population.

"If we have to raise taxes, we can raise it another way. There are plenty of other ways to raise revenue," said realtor Martin Hill.

The amount of revenue produced by the tax would be unstable, according to realtors opposed to the tax.

"How are we going to budget with it? We don't know what it's going to be from year to year, because that's market-dependent," realtor Phyllis Brookshire said.

County officials told WRAL the transfer tax would pay for building new infrastructure, primarily schools. It could also cover construction costs for new roads or water and sewer lines.

Realtors and builders bitterly fought the General Assembly's passage of legislation allowing county referendums on the tax. The Legislature reduced the permitted transfer tax rate from 1 to 0.4 percent and gave counties the option of raising sales taxes by 0.25 percent instead if they want more revenue.

Chatham, Johnston, Harnett and Moore are among 16 counties that will have the transfer tax on the ballot this fall. Chatham County officials are holding a series of five education meetings about the tax.

Wake County commissioners said they definitely plan to place the land transfer tax on the ballot in fall 2008. Meanwhile, Wake Up Wake County is planning its campaign to get it passed.

"We're all in this together," Ridge said."And making sure that we continue to have strong schools benefits the real estate and development industry. And they know that."

RELATED TOPICS: Wake County, Chatham County

e-mail print friendly

45 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 45 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
You folks are getting what your little yuppie hearts deserve, enjoy your feelings of living sucessfully, hope you enjoy the ever growing bill for it, coupled with a government full of unqualified self serving wasteful politicians who we voted, or didn't bother voting, in. Rotate your govenment and school boards like you do your panty folks, or they develope their own agenda.

Impact fees don't work....they just get passed to the consumer. You people don't actually think the developers out of the goodness of his heart just pays more money do you??? They just raise the price of the property. If they HAVE to, they just build BIGGER MORE expensive homes to offset the additional expense, so impact fees really only hurt the poorer people. I have an idea, why not cut wasteful spending????

The cost of growth should be paid for by those desiring it, either for development purposes or personal ones.

It should NOT be borne by those who lived here before the growth took place. What recompense would they receive for paying higher taxes just because neighbor is moving in? Nothing! And they would face more noise, pollution and congestion, in most cases.

Praying for change.

God bless.

Rev. RB

FriendlyPrimate....who makes the decisions that affect every tax-payer, the politician. If they want to increase taxes do it with a general sales tax so everyone shares in proportion to what they spend. The people who pay no taxes get most of the benefits of government services.

I see lots of general complaints that the city taxes us too much, but I don't see any specifics as to what they should stop spending money on. Fewer cops maybe? Get rid of the parks and greenways that make this city enjoyable? Perhaps we could hire some illegal immigrants to teach our kids? Maybe get rid of schools altogether (kids are moochers anyway)? Any ideas? Or do we just want to be able to complain about something? Who cares about coming up with real solutions when we can just blame everything on the politicians, right?

View Comments VIEW ALL 45 COMMENTS
Report It

Multimedia

Click Here