Log in to WRAL.com with one click using your favorite social network:
OR
Log in using your WRAL.com account:



Wrong email/password combination.

Forgot password?

Register with WRAL.com using your favorite social network:
OR
Register for a WRAL.com account using our web form.

3:01 a.m. • 5-22-13

Weather Forecast for Raleigh

  • Today: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 86° F
  • Thu: Thunderstorm.
    • Hi: 83° F
  • Fri: Partly Cloudy.
    • Hi: 76° F

Other Locations

> 7 Day Forecast

Doppler Image

Published: 2007-09-20 17:09:00
Updated: 2007-09-20 22:06:52

Tennessee Death Penalty Ruling Could Impact N.C.


Death Row, Death Penalty, Execution (Generic)
Death Row, Death Penalty, Execution (Generic)
print friendly

A federal court ruling in a Tennessee death penalty case could add to the dispute over North Carolina's execution protocol.

U.S. District Judge Aleta Trauger ruled Wednesday that Tennessee's lethal injection procedures are cruel and unusual punishment, delaying an execution planned for next week.

The new protocol, released in April, "presents a substantial risk of unnecessary pain" and violates death-row inmate Edward Jerome Harbison's constitutional protections under the Eighth Amendment, Trauger said. The protocol doesn't ensure that inmates are properly anesthetized before the lethal injection is administered, which could "result in a terrifying, excruciating death," she said.

Harbison was scheduled to be executed Sept. 26 for beating an elderly woman to death during a burglary in 1983.

Tennessee uses the same cocktail of drugs in executions as North Carolina: sodium pentathol is used to render the inmate unconscious. Pavulon then paralyzes the body, and potassium chloride kills the inmate by stopping the heart.

North Carolina Senior Administrative Law Judge Fred Morrison Jr. last month ordered state officials to review the execution protocol, saying lawyers for inmates weren't allowed to provide input and ask questions about whether the procedures adequately protected inmates against cruel and unusual punishment.

"I noticed it's the same thing we're dealing with in North Carolina," Morrison said of the Tennessee ruling. "I didn't think it verified or ensured that the person is unconscious before they poison him or put him to death."

North Carolina's death penalty has been on hold since January, when the state Medical Board adopted a policy that threatened disciplinary action against any physician who participated in an execution.

A judge ruled that the policy conflicted with state law requiring the presence of a physician at executions, and he said the Council of State would have to resolve the matter. The Council of State, a group of nine elected officials, including Gov. Mike Easley, then revised the execution protocol and increased the role of physicians in executions.

The Council of State is expected to take another look at the protocol next month. Labor Commissioner Cherie Berry, who sits on the council, said she wants the dispute resolved soon so executions can resume.

"If we're going to have the death penalty, (these rulings require) that we do it the right way. If not, I'm not sure the courts are going to let anybody be executed," Morrison said.


35 Comments


WRAL.com welcomes your comments on this story. All comments are moderated prior to publication based on our posting guidelines. Please review them prior to posting and if your message is not approved.

View Comments VIEW ALL 35 COMMENTS

This story is closed for comments. Comments on WRAL.com news stories are accepted and moderated between the hours of 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Monday through Friday.

Latest Comments
starfckerboy,

Me being wrongfully accused, convicted and executed for a capital crime, while highly unlikely, is a risk I am willing to take to ensure swift, final justice for those who need it.

In the same vein, I risk killing myself getting into my car and driving every single day, but I do it, since the benefits out-way the probably of risk. I also risk walking outside during a thunderstorm, knowing I could be innocently struck down by lightening.

The sad part is that I know that swift death would not be a deterrent, since those who commit savage murder most often don't have the impulse control to consider the results of their actions in the first place.

I support a swift, cheap death penalty to save money.

I'm for hanging them before sundown. There is no deterent value left in the current system.

"When will we stop killing people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?"

This is so idiotic. You make it sound bad. Here is my amended sentence of yours to illustrate why the death penalty is RIGHT:

"When will we stop killing GUILTY people who kill (SLAUGHTER) INNOCENT people to show that killing (SLAUGHTERING) INNOCENT people is wrong?"

We won't. And shouldn't.

starfckerboy, you've never had someone very close to you murdered have you? It will change your mind, it did mine.

Witnesses recant all the time even for minor cases. Nothing you say will change my mind and nothing I can say will change yours. I guess I empathize better with victims than murderers.

While politics runs it usual course, use the firing squad in the interim.

View Comments VIEW ALL 35 COMMENTS